[PATCH v6 3/9] docs: Add Generic Counter interface documentation
From: Fabrice Gasnier <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-25 09:26:38
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iio, lkml
On 05/22/2018 07:08 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+* Quadrature x2 Rising: + Rising edges on either quadrature pair signals updates the respective + count. Quadrature encoding determines the direction.This one I've never met. Really? There are devices who do this form of crazy? It gives really uneven counting and I'm failing to see when it would ever make sense... References for these odd corner cases would be good. __|---|____|-----|____ ____|----|____|-----|____ 001122222223334444444That's the same reaction I had when I discovered this -- in fact the STM32 LP Timer is the first time I've come across such a quadrature mode. I'm not sure of the use case for this mode, because positioning wouldn't be precise as you've pointed out. Perhaps Fabrice or Benjamin can probe the ST guys responsible for this design choice to figure out the rationale.Hmm. My inclination would be to not support it unless someone can up with a meaningful use. We are adding ABI (be it not much) for a case that to us makes no sense.
Hi Jonathan, William, Sorry for the late reply. To follow your advise, we can probably drop this for now. I think simple counter, or quadrature x4 will be mostly used for now. As you pointed out, there's not much ABI for x2 rising/falling cases. It will not be a big deal to add it later if needed. I can help to update (remove & test) this in LP-Timer counter driver if you wish. Please let me know, Thanks, Fabrice
Looks rather like the sort of thing that is a side effect of the implementation rather than deliberate.quoted
I'm leaving in these modes for now, as they do exist in the STM32 LP Timer, but it does make me curious what the intentions for them were (perhaps use cases outside of traditional quadrature encoder positioning).Sure if there is a usecase then fair enough. Jonathan