On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Miquel Raynal
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2018 19:17:04 +0300, Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
Do we actually have the possibility to rename this gpio? I guess no
since it would break DT backward compatibility.
No we don't.
Otherwise it would have
been more descriptive to call it something like 'gpio-rb'.
"gpio" prefix, actually "gpios" suffix is a mandatory part of the
name. For sake of convenience it's not used in API calls.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko