[PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts: Add msm8998 SoC and MTP board support
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-07 23:00:01
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2018-04-27 22:42:47)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d6665e4f801f --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,340 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2016, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */ + +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8998.h> + +/ { + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. MSM 8998"; + + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; + + qcom,msm-id = <292 0x0>;
No update to dtbtool?
+
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+
+ chosen { };
+
+ memory {
+ device_type = "memory";
+ /* We expect the bootloader to fill in the reg */
+ reg = <0 0 0 0>;
+ };
+
+ cpus {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ CPU0: cpu at 0 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,armv8";
+ reg = <0x0 0x0>;
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ efficiency = <1024>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
+ L2_0: l2-cache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ cache-level = <2>;
+ };
+ L1_I_0: l1-icache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ L1_D_0: l1-dcache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ };
+
+ CPU1: cpu at 1 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,armv8";
+ reg = <0x0 0x1>;
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ efficiency = <1024>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
+ L1_I_1: l1-icache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ L1_D_1: l1-dcache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ };
+
+ CPU2: cpu at 2 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,armv8";
+ reg = <0x0 0x2>;
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ efficiency = <1024>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
+ L1_I_2: l1-icache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ L1_D_2: l1-dcache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ };
+
+ CPU3: cpu at 3 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,armv8";
+ reg = <0x0 0x3>;
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ efficiency = <1024>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
+ L1_I_3: l1-icache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ L1_D_3: l1-dcache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ };
+
+ CPU4: cpu at 100 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,armv8";
+ reg = <0x0 0x100>;
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ efficiency = <1536>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
+ L2_1: l2-cache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ cache-level = <2>;
+ };
+ L1_I_100: l1-icache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ L1_D_100: l1-dcache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ };
+
+ CPU5: cpu at 101 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,armv8";
+ reg = <0x0 0x101>;
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ efficiency = <1536>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
+ L1_I_101: l1-icache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ L1_D_101: l1-dcache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ };
+
+ CPU6: cpu at 102 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,armv8";
+ reg = <0x0 0x102>;
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ efficiency = <1536>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
+ L1_I_102: l1-icache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ L1_D_102: l1-dcache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ };
+
+ CPU7: cpu at 103 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,armv8";
+ reg = <0x0 0x103>;
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ efficiency = <1536>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
+ L1_I_103: l1-icache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ L1_D_103: l1-dcache {
+ compatible = "arm,arch-cache";
+ };
+ };
+
+ cpu-map {
+ cluster0 {
+ core0 {
+ cpu = <&CPU0>;
+ };
+
+ core1 {
+ cpu = <&CPU1>;
+ };
+
+ core2 {
+ cpu = <&CPU2>;
+ };
+
+ core3 {
+ cpu = <&CPU3>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ cluster1 {
+ core0 {
+ cpu = <&CPU4>;
+ };
+
+ core1 {
+ cpu = <&CPU5>;
+ };
+
+ core2 {
+ cpu = <&CPU6>;
+ };
+
+ core3 {
+ cpu = <&CPU7>;
+ };
+ };
+ };I still wonder if this is accurate, but OK.
+ };
+
+ timer {
+ compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
+ interrupts = <GIC_PPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
+ <GIC_PPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
+ <GIC_PPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
+ <GIC_PPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
+ };
+
+ clocks {
+ xo_board {
+ compatible = "fixed-clock";
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ clock-frequency = <19200000>;
+ };
+
+ sleep_clk {
+ compatible = "fixed-clock";
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ clock-frequency = <32764>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ psci {
+ compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
+ method = "smc";
+ };
+
+ soc: soc {};
+};
+
+&soc {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
+ compatible = "simple-bus";
+
+ intc: interrupt-controller at 17a00000 {
+ compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
+ reg = <0x17a00000 0x10000>, /* GICD */
+ <0x17b00000 0x100000>; /* GICR * 8 */
+ #interrupt-cells = <3>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #redistributor-regions = <1>;
+ redistributor-stride = <0x0 0x20000>;Is this needed? The redistributor stuff can be left out if there's only one right?
+ interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ };
+
+ blsp2_uart1: serial at c1b0000 {Clk name says uart2 though?
+ compatible = "qcom,msm-uartdm-v1.4", "qcom,msm-uartdm"; + reg = <0xc1b0000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 114 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP2_UART2_APPS_CLK>, + <&gcc GCC_BLSP2_AHB_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", "iface"; + status = "disabled"; + }; +