On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:18:24AM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:

Hi Jan,

On 04/30/2018 08:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:

quoted

From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

Straightforward for all of them, no more leaks afterwards.

CC: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
CC: Joao Pinto <redacted>
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <redacted>

[snip]

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
index 6ab28f29ac6a..6eb36c924983 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c

@@ -1067,12 +1067,11 @@ static int rcar_pcie_parse_request_of_pci_ranges(struct rcar_pcie *pci)
 {
 	int err;
 	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
-	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	resource_size_t iobase;
 	struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;
 
-	err = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(np, 0, 0xff, &pci->resources,
-					       &iobase);
+	err = devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(dev, 0, 0xff,
+						    &pci->resources, &iobase);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 

this one snippet is obsoleted by https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/904326/

If 08/10 remains a deprecation, then it is sufficient to exclude the R-Car change,
otherwise I hope maintainers can deal with the proper ordering.

Isn't applying your patch:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/904326/

and dropping the rcar hunk from this patch enough ?

Lorenzo