On Tue, 1 May 2018 16:01:42 +0530
Sekhar Nori [off-list ref] wrote:

On Monday 30 April 2018 03:39 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:

quoted

Hi Bartosz,

On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:24:41 +0200
Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:
  

quoted

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>

We have the 'ti,davinci-chipselect' property in the device tree, but
when using platform data the driver silently uses the id field of
struct platform_device as the chipselect. This is confusing and we
almost broke the nand support again recently after converting the
platform to common clock framework (which changed the device id in the
clock lookup - the problem is gone now that we no longer acquire the
clock in the nand driver.

This series adds a new field to davinci-nand platform data, then makes
all board use it and finally modifies the two drivers that make use of
it.

Bartosz Golaszewski (12):
  mtd: nand: davinci: store the core chipselect number in platform data  

Raw NAND related patches (that is, everything that is not onenand or
SPI NAND) should use the "mtd: rawnand: " prefix now. Other than that,
I'm fine with the patch series, just let me know how you want to have it  

Hi Boris, should I convert the "I'm fine" to some sort of formal tag? If
yes, what is the tag and for which patches?

Yep, you can add

Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <redacted>

on patches 1 and 11.

Thanks,

Boris