[PATCH] tty: pl011: Avoid spuriously stuck-off interrupts
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
Date: 2018-04-30 12:49:19
Also in:
linux-serial
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 03:18:57PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:05:44AM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:quoted
This is an update to a previous RFC [1], to fix a problem observed by the qemu community that causes serial input to hang when booting a simulated system with data already queued in the UART FIFO [2]. This patch could cause problems for people that are actually relying on chars queued in the PL011 RX FIFO during boot or while the UART is closed. There are no guarantees about such things working in general. In either case, there is no protection against RX FIFO overflow or reprogramming of the UART parameters while Linux is not actively receiving chars. Cheers ---Dave [1] [RFC PATCH v4] tty: pl011: Avoid spuriously stuck-off interrupts http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-April/574033.html [2] [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] pl011: do not put into fifo before enabled the interruption https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-01/msg06446.html Dave Martin (1): tty: pl011: Avoid spuriously stuck-off interrupts drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) -- 2.1.4There is no patch here, did something go wrong? You do not need a "cover letter" for a single patch...
I wanted to provide some additional context for the benefit of people who'd been reviewing earler RFCs for this change, though I could have put it under the tearoff instead. I was expecting --cover-letter to generate [PATCH 0/1] and [PATCH 1/1] Subject lines, but it seems that it doesn't do that. To clarify, there is only intended to be one patch here. Do you want me to repost? Cheers ---Dave