[PATCH v3 09/10] DT: QCOM: Add cpufreq-dt to msm8996
From: ilialin at codeaurora.org <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-20 20:34:04
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-devicetree
Understood, what you mean. I assumed that the cpufreq-dt is generic driver, and adding architecture specific code to it is no not correct from architectural point of view. Anyway, I'm considering adding a platform specific cpufreq driver, which will handle the efuse data as well. Meanwhile this is the way to use the generic driver.
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 22:06 To: ilialin at codeaurora.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm- msm at vger.kernel.org; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; sboyd at codeaurora.org Cc: mark.rutland at arm.com; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; rnayak at codeaurora.org; robh at kernel.org; will.deacon at arm.com; amit.kucheria at linaro.org; tfinkel at codeaurora.org; nicolas.dechesne at linaro.org; celster at codeaurora.org Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 09/10] DT: QCOM: Add cpufreq-dt to msm8996 Quoting ilialin at codeaurora.org (2018-03-20 06:46:19)quoted
quoted
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Quoting Ilia Lin (2018-02-14 05:59:51)quoted
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.cb/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c index 3b585e4..b6cd0ae 100644--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ { .compatible = "xlnx,zynq-7000", }, { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp", }, + { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996", }, + { .compatible = "qcom,apq8096", }, +Why can't we base it on the kryocc node being present?This could be good idea, if I would writing a platform specific cpufreq driver,which may be a future option. Well maybe cpufreq-dt can also look at the cpus nodes for a cpu with a certain type (in this case kryo). Then we can add cpufreq dt based on that CPU node being there.quoted
quoted
Or even populate the cpufreq-dt from the kryocc driver?There is a problem that during the clock probe the OPP table still doesn'texist. The OPP table is in DT? Why doesn't it exist?