On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:59 PM, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2018-03-21 10:59:10)

quoted

On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:58 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

From: Stephen Boyd <redacted>

Some qcom platforms make some GPIOs or pins unavailable for use by
non-secure operating systems, and thus reading or writing the
registers
for those pins will cause access control issues. Add support for a DT
property to describe the set of GPIOs that are available for use so
that
higher level OSes are able to know what pins to avoid reading/writing.
Non-DT platforms can add support by directly updating the
chip->valid_mask.

quoted

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <redacted>

Hmm...

Don't look closely! :P

Same physical person acting on behalf of two different legal
entities right? Seems OK to me.

Yours,
Linus Walleij