Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2018-03-21

[PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()

From: okaya at codeaurora.org <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-21 22:14:56
Also in: intel-wired-lan, linux-arm-msm, lkml, netdev

On 2018-03-21 17:54, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher <redacted>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:48:08 -0700
quoted
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
quoted
Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
wmb().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.
For a change with delicate side effects, it doesn't create much
confidence if the code does not even compile.

Sinan, please put more care into the changes you are making.
I think the issue is the tree that code is getting tested has 
undelivered code as Alex mentioned.

I was using linux-next 4.16 rc4 for testing.

I will rebase to Jeff's tree.
Thank you.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help