On 03/10/2018 02:30 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Rajendra Nayak [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

+               gcc: clock-controller at 100000 {
+                       compatible = "qcom,gcc-sdm845";
+                       reg = <0x100000 0x1f0000>;
+                       #clock-cells = <1>;
+                       #reset-cells = <1>;
+               };

Seems like we need "#power-domain-cells = <1>;" in the gcc node.

It is true that the property is listed as "optional" in the bindings,
but we certainly know that the
"include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdm845.h" that's posted [1]
contains several defines ending in "_GDSC" and once we start
referencing those we'll need "#power-domain-cells".  Seems like we
should just have it from the beginning.

NOTE: IMHO adding "#power-domain-cells" could be done as a follow-on
patch, but since (I think) this series still hasn't landed I guess we
could just send up v6?

thanks for catching this, I'll send out v6 in a bit.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10267093/


-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation