Thread (51 messages) 51 messages, 6 authors, 2018-03-13

[PATCH 0/29] arm meltdown fix backporting review for lts 4.9

From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-02 16:54:15
Also in: lkml, stable

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:14:50PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:

On 03/01/2018 11:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:56:22AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
quoted
Hi All,

This backport patchset fixed the meltdown issue, it's original branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=kpti
A few dependency or fixingpatches are also picked up, if they are necessary
 and no functional changes.

The patchset also on repository:
	git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-stable.git lts-4.9-spectrevv2 

No bug found yet from kernelci.org and lkft testing.
No bugs is good, but does it actually fix the meltdown problem?  What
did you test it on?
Oh, I have no A73/A75 cpu, so I can not reproduce meltdown bug.
Then why should I trust this backport at all?

Please test on the hardware that is affected, otherwise you do not know
if your patches do anything or not.
quoted
And why are you making this patchset up?  What is wrong with the patches
in the android-common tree for this?
We believe the LTS is the base kernel for android/lsk, so the fixing
patches should get it first and then merge to other tree.
But you know that android-common is already fine here, the needed
patches are all integrated into there, so no additional work is needed
for android devices.  So what devices do you expect to use this 4.9
backport?

What is "lsk"?
quoted
quoted
Any comments are appreciated!
You need to start versioning this changeset, as I have no idea if this
is the "latest" one or not, right?>
Or have you not sent out this patchset before?  How does this interact
with the "spectre" patches?  Or am I totally confused here?
It is the first patchset for meltdown. Yes, I will resent this patchset
with versioning after the renesas board booting fixed.

The meltdown and spectre is 2 different bugs, the fixing patchset are
isolated each other. So I did the backport as 2 different patchset. And
merging them together is relative simple. I will comming with a merge
patch next time, after the meltdown patchset ready.(the kernelci didn't
works well in recent days)
I don't want a merged patchset, but having one dependant on the other is
just fine.

Again, test this on real hardware properly first.

But really, I don't see this need as all ARM devices that I know of that
are stuck on 4.9.y are already using the android-common tree.  Same for
4.4.y.  Do you know of any that are not, and that can not just use
4.14.y instead?

thanks,

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help