[PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: Document Renesas R-Car M3-N-based Salvator-X board
From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman)
Date: 2018-02-28 06:51:50
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-renesas-soc
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:25:42PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Simon, On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
The Renesas Salvator-X development board can be equipped with an R-Car H3, M3-W, or M3-N SiP, which are pin-compatible. Document board part number and compatible values for the version with R-Car M3-N. The board part number was extracted from a big patch by Takeshi Kihara in the BSP.quoted
quoted
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt@@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ Boards: compatible = "renesas,salvator-x", "renesas,r8a7795" - Salvator-X (RTP0RC7796SIPB0011S)Here we have: Name (Part No)That's the standard (highest number of occurrences) way.quoted
quoted
compatible = "renesas,salvator-x", "renesas,r8a7796" + - Salvator-X (RTP0RC7796SIPB0011S (M3N))Here we have: Name (Part No (SoC))This one is special: it's basically an M3-N prototype board made by taking a Salvator-X/M3-W board, and replacing the M3-W SiP by an M3-N SiP. Hence the board part number is the same.quoted
quoted
+ compatible = "renesas,salvator-x", "renesas,r8a77965" - Salvator-XS (Salvator-X 2nd version, RTP0RC7795SIPB0012S)And here we have: Name (Version, Part No)AFAIU, "Salvator-XS" really means "Salvator-X 2nd version". So it's not "Version", but "Alternative Board Name". There's a similar thing with the ULCB boards: - H3ULCB (R-Car Starter Kit Premier, RTP0RC7795SKBX0010SA00 (H3 ES1.1)) H3ULCB (R-Car Starter Kit Premier, RTP0RC77951SKBX010SA00 (H3 ES2.0)) - M3ULCB (R-Car Starter Kit Pro, RTP0RC7796SKBX0010SA09 (M3 ES1.0))quoted
quoted
compatible = "renesas,salvator-xs", "renesas,r8a7795" - Salvator-XS (Salvator-X 2nd version, RTP0RC7796SIPB0012S)Can we think about making this more consistent?I'm afraid not. Naming seems to become only more complex over time... Unless you have great hands and great ideas ;-)
Not so many good ideas this morning. I've applied this as is. We can revisit if the need arises.