[PATCH] cpufreq: scpi: invoke frequency-invariance setter function
From: rafael@kernel.org (Rafael J. Wysocki)
Date: 2018-02-26 09:32:16
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: rafael@kernel.org (Rafael J. Wysocki)
Date: 2018-02-26 09:32:16
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Dietmar Eggemann [off-list ref] wrote:
On 02/22/2018 11:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:quoted
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Dietmar Eggemann [off-list ref] wrote:[...]quoted
quoted
Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency") Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <redacted> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <redacted> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>This is really minor, but I would reorder this slightly.Tried to figure out what would be the better order. Not sure since I saw different examples. Can you tell what would be the best tag order?
I was talking about the patch, not about tags, sorry for the confusion. Frankly, I don't care about the ordering of the tags. :-)