Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2018-02-26

[PATCH] cpufreq: scpi: invoke frequency-invariance setter function

From: rafael@kernel.org (Rafael J. Wysocki)
Date: 2018-02-26 09:32:16
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Dietmar Eggemann
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 02/22/2018 11:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Dietmar Eggemann
[off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency")
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <redacted>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
This is really minor, but I would reorder this slightly.
Tried to figure out what would be the better order. Not sure since I saw
different examples. Can you tell what would be the best tag order?
I was talking about the patch, not about tags, sorry for the confusion.

Frankly, I don't care about the ordering of the tags. :-)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help