Thread (78 messages) 78 messages, 4 authors, 2018-02-09

[PATCH v2 06/20] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification

From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose)
Date: 2018-02-07 16:56:48
Also in: lkml

On 07/02/18 10:38, Dave Martin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 06:27:53PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
quoted
Now that each capability describes how to treat the conflicts
of CPU cap state vs System wide cap state, we can unify the
verification logic to a single place.

Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h |  1 +
  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 1b29b3f0a1bc..5e4d581c97f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1233,6 +1233,56 @@ static void __init enable_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *
  	}
  }
  
+/*
+ * Run through the list of capabilities to check for conflicts.
+ * If the system has already detected a capability, take necessary
+ * action on this CPU.
+ *
+ * Returns "false" on conflicts.
+ */
+static bool __verify_local_cpu_caps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps_list)
+{
+	bool cpu_has_cap, system_has_cap;
+	const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = caps_list;
+
+	for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
+		cpu_has_cap = __this_cpu_has_cap(caps_list, caps->capability);
+		system_has_cap =  cpus_have_cap(caps->capability);
Nit: Odd spacing?
Fixed
[...]

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Thanks
Suzuki
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help