[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add minimal dts/dtsi files for sdm845 SoC and MTP
From: Rajendra Nayak <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-07 04:47:10
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml
[]..
quoted
+ +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> + +/ { + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SDM845";This should only be in the board level file.
thanks, will fix.
quoted
+ + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; + + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + + chosen { }; + + memory { + device_type = "memory"; + /* We expect the bootloader to fill in the reg */The start address is variable? If not you should populate the base and have a unit-address.
sure, I'll check and update.
quoted
+ reg = <0 0 0 0>; + }; +
[]..
quoted
+ + soc: soc { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>; + compatible = "simple-bus"; + + intc: interrupt-controller at 17a00000 { + compatible = "arm,gic-v3"; + #interrupt-cells = <3>; + interrupt-controller; + #redistributor-regions = <1>; + redistributor-stride = <0x0 0x20000>; + reg = <0x17a00000 0x10000>, /* GICD */ + <0x17a60000 0x100000>; /* GICR * 8 */ + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + }; + + gcc: clock-controller at 100000 { + compatible = "qcom,gcc-sdm845";sdm845-gcc is the preferred order.
This is still proposed as part of the GCC patch for sdm845 [1]
(which looks like has neither you nor the DT list copied :/ )
Also looking at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt,
I see we seem to follow the gcc-<soc> convention for compatible all along :(
"qcom,gcc-apq8064"
"qcom,gcc-apq8084"
"qcom,gcc-ipq8064"
"qcom,gcc-ipq4019"
"qcom,gcc-ipq8074"
"qcom,gcc-msm8660"
"qcom,gcc-msm8916"
"qcom,gcc-msm8960"
"qcom,gcc-msm8974"
"qcom,gcc-msm8974pro"
"qcom,gcc-msm8974pro-ac"
"qcom,gcc-msm8994"
"qcom,gcc-msm8996"
"qcom,gcc-mdm9615"
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10193895/
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation