Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2018-01-18

FW: [PATCH v20 2/4] mailbox: mediatek: Add Mediatek CMDQ driver

From: houlong.wei@mediatek.com (houlong wei)
Date: 2018-01-18 08:32:02
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml

Hi Jassi,

There is one request for one GCE h/w buffer which contains a list of
registers operation.
I will resubmit a version and please review again.

Thanks,
Houlong

On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 16:01 +0800, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:08 PM, houlong wei [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Jassi,

Sorry for reply so late.
According to previous discussion, there are two methods to move
dma_map_single() outside of spin_lock.
(1) put in mtk-cmdq-helper.c, as described by HS on 2017-02-09.
  > I think a trade-off solution is to put in mtk-cmdq-helper.c.
  > Although it is a mailbox client, it is not a CMDQ client.
  > We can include mailbox_controller.h in mtk-cmdq-helper.c (instead of
mtk-cmdq.h), and then map dma at cmdq_pkt_flush_async before
mbox_send_message.

  > pkt->pa_base = dma_map_single(client->chan->mbox->dev, pkt->va_base,
  >                              pkt->cmd_buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
(2) schedule a tasklet in send_data().

After internal discussion with HS and other experts, now we prefer
method (1).
How do you think about it?
I don't exactly see how you mean but please remember send_data()
callback is supposed to be atomic ... it is protected by
spin_lock_irqsave/restore in drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c:msg_submit()

BTW, how many requests max can be queued in the GCE h/w buffer?
And since it's been over a year now, could you please resubmit after
checking for checkpatch with the --strict option?

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help