[PATCH v6 07/12] drivers: base cacheinfo: Add support for ACPI based firmware tables
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg KH)
Date: 2018-01-22 15:50:22
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-pm, lkml
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:59:15PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add a entry to to struct cacheinfo to maintain a reference to the PPTT node which can be used to match identical caches across cores. Also stub out cache_setup_acpi() so that individual architectures can enable ACPI topology parsing. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <redacted> --- drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 1 + drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 20 +++++++++++++------- include/linux/cacheinfo.h | 9 +++++++++ 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c index 2c4b3ed862a8..4f5ab19c3a08 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ static void update_cache_properties(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, { int valid_flags = 0; + this_leaf->fw_unique = cpu_node; if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_SIZE_PROPERTY_VALID) { this_leaf->size = found_cache->size; valid_flags++;diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c index 217aa90fb036..ee51e33cc37c 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c@@ -208,16 +208,16 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu) if (index != cache_leaves(cpu)) /* not all OF nodes populated */ return -ENOENT; - return 0; } +
Whitespace changes not needed for this patch :(
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
#else static inline int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu) { return 0; } static inline bool cache_leaves_are_shared(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, struct cacheinfo *sib_leaf) { /* - * For non-DT systems, assume unique level 1 cache, system-wide + * For non-DT/ACPI systems, assume unique level 1 caches, system-wide * shared caches for all other levels. This will be used only if * arch specific code has not populated shared_cpu_map */@@ -225,6 +225,11 @@ static inline bool cache_leaves_are_shared(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, } #endif +int __weak cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return -ENOTSUPP; +} + static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);@@ -235,11 +240,11 @@ static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu) if (this_cpu_ci->cpu_map_populated) return 0; - if (of_have_populated_dt()) + if (!acpi_disabled) + ret = cache_setup_acpi(cpu);
Why does acpi go first? :)
+ else if (of_have_populated_dt())
ret = cache_setup_of_node(cpu);
- else if (!acpi_disabled)
- /* No cache property/hierarchy support yet in ACPI */
- ret = -ENOTSUPP;
+
if (ret)
return ret;
+int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ /*ACPI kernels should be built with PPTT support*/Here are some extra ' ' characters, you need them... thanks, greg k-h