Hi Sudeep,

-----Original Message-----
From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla at arm.com]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 3:47 AM
To: Jolly Shah <redacted>; michal.simek at xilinx.com; linux-
clk at vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <redacted>; mturquette at baylibre.com;
sboyd at codeaurora.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver support



On 11/01/18 20:29, Jolly Shah wrote:

quoted

Hi Sudeep,

There are 3 things:

1> IPI mailbox transport - series is already posted
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10145795/
2> EEMI - Posted by me below
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10150665/
3> EEMI Users
Currently posted as RFC as they are dependent on #2.
OK, can #2 and #3 can be put together until initial review ?

quoted

#2 doesn?t use mailbox so it is a posted as a separate series.

OK, does it use smc ? If so, the point is treat it as smc mailbox so that smc is just
a transport and EEMI can be still used with other transport technically.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

I am not sure if I get you correctly. 
Yes, EEMI uses SMC interface to communicate to PMU. Do you suggest to use Andre's SMC mailbox driver as transport for EEMI? 

Thanks,
Jolly Shah