[PATCH 05/12] arm64: dts: mt7622: add PMIC MT6380 related nodes
From: sean.wang@mediatek.com (Sean Wang)
Date: 2018-01-05 03:42:45
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 11:27 +0100, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
Sean, On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:40 AM, [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> Enable pwrap and MT6380 on mt7622-rfb1 board. Also add all mt6380 regulator nodes in an alone file to allow similar boards using MT6380 able to resue the configuration. Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6380.dtsi | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-rfb1.dts | 8 +++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi | 12 ++++ 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6380.dtsidiff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6380.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6380.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7eb7dc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6380.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc. + * Author: Chenglin Xu <chenglin.xu@mediatek.com> + * Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + */Would you mind using SPDX tags instead of this fine but long legalese? This is documented in Thomas patches [1].
Also if you could spread the word in your team, this would earn you good karma points. Thank you! [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/28/323
Hi, Philippe thanks for your suggestion Certainly, this can be replaced with SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 most drivers from MediaTek use the similar disclaimer, it should be fine to use SPDX tags instead. Sean