[PATCH v4 5/7] clk: Introduce davinci clocks
From: david@lechnology.com (David Lechner)
Date: 2018-01-04 17:46:08
Also in:
linux-clk, lkml
On 1/4/18 6:28 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Wednesday 03 January 2018 03:01 AM, David Lechner wrote:quoted
Forgot to cc linux-clk, so doing that now... On 12/31/2017 05:39 PM, David Lechner wrote:quoted
This introduces new drivers for arch/arm/mach-davinci. The code is based on the clock drivers from there and adapted to use the common clock framework. Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> --- ? drivers/clk/Makefile????????????????????? |?? 1 + ? drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile????????????? |?? 3 + ? drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip-clk.c?? | 380 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ? drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c???????????????? | 333 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ? drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c???????????????? | 217 +++++++++++++++++ ? include/linux/clk/davinci.h?????????????? |? 46 ++++ ? include/linux/platform_data/davinci_clk.h |? 25 ++ ? 7 files changed, 1005 insertions(+)This is a pretty huge patch and I think each of cfgchip, pll and PSC clocks deserve a patch of their own.
Will do.
On the PLL patch, please describe how the PLL implementation on DaVinci is different from Keystone, so no reuse is really possible. Similarly for the PSC patch (no non-DT support in keystone etc).
OK.
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8ae85ee --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@quoted
quoted
+static void psc_config(struct davinci_psc_clk *psc, +?????????????? enum davinci_psc_state next_state) +{ +??? u32 epcpr, ptcmd, pdstat, pdctl, mdstat, mdctl, ptstat; + +??? mdctl = readl(psc->base + MDCTL + 4 * psc->lpsc); +??? mdctl &= ~MDSTAT_STATE_MASK; +??? mdctl |= next_state; +??? /* TODO: old davinci clocks for da850 set MDCTL_FORCE bit for sata and +???? * dsp here. Is this really needed? +???? */ +??? writel(mdctl, psc->base + MDCTL + 4 * psc->lpsc); + +??? pdstat = readl(psc->base + PDSTAT + 4 * psc->pd); +??? if ((pdstat & PDSTAT_STATE_MASK) == 0) { +??????? pdctl = readl(psc->base + PDSTAT + 4 * psc->pd); +??????? pdctl |= PDCTL_NEXT; +??????? writel(pdctl, psc->base + PDSTAT + 4 * psc->pd); + +??????? ptcmd = BIT(psc->pd); +??????? writel(ptcmd, psc->base + PTCMD); + +??????? do { +??????????? epcpr = __raw_readl(psc->base + EPCPR); +??????? } while (!(epcpr & BIT(psc->pd))); + +??????? pdctl = __raw_readl(psc->base + PDCTL + 4 * psc->pd); +??????? pdctl |= PDCTL_EPCGOOD; +??????? __raw_writel(pdctl, psc->base + PDCTL + 4 * psc->pd);Can we shift to regmap here too? Then the polling loops like above can be converted to regmap_read_poll_timeout() too like you have done elsewhere.
I'll give it a try.