Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 2 authors, 2017-12-13

[PATCH 2/4] [v2] gpiolib: add bitmask for valid GPIO lines

From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-12 20:16:54
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-gpio

On 12/12/2017 03:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 17:28 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
quoted
Add support for specifying that some GPIOs within a range are
unavailable.
Some systems have a sparse list of GPIOs, where a range of GPIOs is
specified (usually 0 to n-1), but some subset within that range is
absent or unavailable for whatever reason.

To support this, allow drivers to specify a bitmask of GPIOs that
are present or absent.  Gpiolib will then block access to those that
are absent.
  
quoted
-	status = gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask(chip);
+	status = gpiochip_init_valid_mask(chip);
  	if (status)
  		goto err_remove_from_list;
  
+	status = gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask(chip);
+	if (status)
+		goto err_remove_valid_mask;
Yes, this way it looks good!
I've discovered that I can remove all this code.  I don't need a valid 
mask, all I need to do is block the request properly.
quoted
+static bool gpiochip_available(const struct gpio_chip *gpiochip,
+			   unsigned int offset)
+{
quoted
+	pr_info("%s:%u offset=%u\n", __func__, __LINE__, offset);
Debug leftover?
Fixed, thanks.
quoted
+
+	/* No mask means all valid */
+	if (likely(!gpiochip->valid_mask))
+		return true;
+
+	return test_bit(offset, gpiochip->valid_mask);
Not sure which one is better
  return test_bit();
or
  return !!test_bit();
I've removed this function also.

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.  Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help