[PATCH 2/4] [v2] gpiolib: add bitmask for valid GPIO lines
From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-12 20:16:54
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-gpio
On 12/12/2017 03:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 17:28 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:quoted
Add support for specifying that some GPIOs within a range are unavailable. Some systems have a sparse list of GPIOs, where a range of GPIOs is specified (usually 0 to n-1), but some subset within that range is absent or unavailable for whatever reason. To support this, allow drivers to specify a bitmask of GPIOs that are present or absent. Gpiolib will then block access to those that are absent.quoted
- status = gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask(chip); + status = gpiochip_init_valid_mask(chip); if (status) goto err_remove_from_list; + status = gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask(chip); + if (status) + goto err_remove_valid_mask;Yes, this way it looks good!
I've discovered that I can remove all this code. I don't need a valid mask, all I need to do is block the request properly.
quoted
+static bool gpiochip_available(const struct gpio_chip *gpiochip, + unsigned int offset) +{quoted
+ pr_info("%s:%u offset=%u\n", __func__, __LINE__, offset);Debug leftover?
Fixed, thanks.
quoted
+ + /* No mask means all valid */ + if (likely(!gpiochip->valid_mask)) + return true; + + return test_bit(offset, gpiochip->valid_mask);Not sure which one is better return test_bit(); or return !!test_bit();
I've removed this function also. -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.