Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-12-15
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: DT dtc warnings · Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden> · 2017-12-15

DT dtc warnings

From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
Date: 2017-12-15 07:34:55
Also in: linux-devicetree

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Alexandre Belloni
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 15/12/2017 at 08:23:39 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Fabio Estevam [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Thanks for reply!

Isn't this property of a SoC? The registers used by
syscon-poweroff/reboot are part of SoC power management unit. It does
not refer to any externals. Why then it should be put outside of soc?
If these nodes have registers, then they should have a unit address
and reg property.
That's the point - they do not have unit address.
Should they be put under the syscon they are using?
They are not using syscon but regmap provided by such external IP
block (for example this:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15-rc3/source/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi#L153).
I guess you are proposing something like on imx7s:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15-rc3/source/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi#L539

That makes sense... I am not sure how this would be related to the
warning itself but anyway it looks logically.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help