[PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Convert to module_platform_driver
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: 2017-12-14 04:29:46
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap, linux-pm
On 13-12-17, 14:33, Dave Gerlach wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
ti-cpufreq will be responsible for calling dev_pm_opp_set_regulators on platforms that require AVS and ABB regulator support so we must be able to defer probe if regulators are not yet available, so change ti-cpufreq to be a module_platform_driver to allow for probe defer. Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <redacted> --- drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c index 923317f03b4b..b1c230a1e2aa 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include <linux/cpu.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> +#include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/of_platform.h>@@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ti_cpufreq_of_match[] = { {}, }; -static int ti_cpufreq_init(void) +static int ti_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { u32 version[VERSION_COUNT]; struct device_node *np;@@ -269,4 +270,22 @@ static int ti_cpufreq_init(void) return ret; } -device_initcall(ti_cpufreq_init); + +static int ti_cpufreq_init(void) +{ + platform_device_register_simple("ti-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0); + return 0; +} +module_init(ti_cpufreq_init); + +static struct platform_driver ti_cpufreq_driver = { + .probe = ti_cpufreq_probe, + .driver = { + .name = "ti-cpufreq", + }, +}; +module_platform_driver(ti_cpufreq_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI CPUFreq/OPP hw-supported driver"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> -- viresh