Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2017-12-22

[PATCH V4 1/1] clk: bulk: add of_clk_bulk_get()

From: Dong Aisheng <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-20 13:53:49
Also in: linux-clk, lkml

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 03:48:21PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 09/26, Dong Aisheng wrote:
quoted
'clock-names' property is optinal in DT, so of_clk_bulk_get() is introduced
s/optinal/optional/
Got it.
quoted
here to handle this for DT users without 'clock-names' specified.

Cc: Stephen Boyd <redacted>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: Russell King <redacted>
Reported-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>

---
Changes since v3:
 * fix build warning on the SH platform

Changes since v2:
 * of_clk_bulk_get should return -ENOENT;

Changes since v1:
 * using %pOF instead of full_name
---
 drivers/clk/clk-bulk.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/clk.h    |  8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-bulk.c b/drivers/clk/clk-bulk.c
index c834f5a..896aa3b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-bulk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-bulk.c
@@ -19,6 +19,37 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_OF) && defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)
+int __must_check of_clk_bulk_get(struct device_node *np, int num_clks,
+				 struct clk_bulk_data *clks)
+{
+	int ret;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++)
+		clks[i].clk = NULL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
+		clks[i].clk = of_clk_get(np, i);
+		if (IS_ERR(clks[i].clk)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(clks[i].clk);
+			pr_err("%pOF: Failed to get clk index: %d ret: %d\n",
+			       np, i, ret);
+			clks[i].clk = NULL;
+			goto err;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err:
+	clk_bulk_put(i, clks);
+
+	return ret;
+}
Export the symbol?
Got it.
quoted
+#endif
 
 void clk_bulk_put(int num_clks, struct clk_bulk_data *clks)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/clk.h b/include/linux/clk.h
index 12c96d9..073cb3b 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk.h
@@ -680,10 +680,18 @@ static inline void clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(int num_clks,
 }
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_OF) && defined(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)
+int __must_check of_clk_bulk_get(struct device_node *np, int num_clks,
+				 struct clk_bulk_data *clks);
 struct clk *of_clk_get(struct device_node *np, int index);
 struct clk *of_clk_get_by_name(struct device_node *np, const char *name);
 struct clk *of_clk_get_from_provider(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec);
 #else
+static inline int of_clk_bulk_get(struct device_node *np, int num_clks,
Do we need __must_check here too?
Yes, you're absolutely right.

of_clk_bulk_get is special as it returns error, so should add __must_check.
We should do the same for the
other bulk get APIs. Seems we missed that part last time.
Currently for !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK case, all APIs return 0.
!CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
clk_bulk_get		return 0
devm_clk_bulk_get	return 0
clk_bulk_enable		return 0
clk_bulk_prepare	return 0

Do you think we still need add __must_check for them?

And for CONFIG_HAVE_CLK case, all __must_check already added.

int __must_check clk_bulk_get
int __must_check devm_clk_bulk_get
int __must_check clk_bulk_enable
int __must_check clk_bulk_prepare

And no need for void function.
void clk_bulk_put
void clk_bulk_unprepare
void clk_bulk_disable
I'll fix all these things up when applying.
I did not see this in latest tree.
Suppose i should resend it with above things fixed, right?

Regards
Dong Aisheng
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help