[PATCH v3 1/8] SOC: brcmstb: add memory API
From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
Date: 2017-12-08 23:29:02
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mips, linux-pci, lkml
On 12/05/2017 12:59 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 05:12:05PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:quoted
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> This commit adds a memory API suitable for ascertaining the sizes of each of the N memory controllers in a Broadcom STB chip. Its first user will be the Broadcom STB PCIe root complex driver, which needs to know these sizes to properly set up DMA mappings for inbound regions. We cannot use memblock here or anything like what Linux provides because it collapses adjacent regions within a larger block, and here we actually need per-memory controller addresses and sizes, which is why we resort to manual DT parsing. Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com> --- drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.c | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/soc/brcmstb/memory_api.h | 25 ++++++ 3 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.c create mode 100644 include/soc/brcmstb/memory_api.hdiff --git a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile index 9120b27..4cea7b6 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile +++ b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile@@ -1 +1 @@ -obj-y += common.o biuctrl.o +obj-y += common.o biuctrl.o memory.odiff --git a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.c b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..eb647ad9 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.cI sort of assume based on [1] that every new file should have an SPDX identifier ("The Linux kernel requires the precise SPDX identifier in all source files") and that the actual text of the GPL can be omitted. Only a few files in drivers/pci currently have an SPDX identifier. I don't know if that's oversight or work-in-progress or what. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204212120.484179273 at linutronix.de
This was submitted before SPDX was consistently enforced tree wide, so yes we should fix this. Any other comment besides that? -- Florian