Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 5 authors, 2017-12-15

[PATCH v3 1/8] SOC: brcmstb: add memory API

From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
Date: 2017-12-08 23:29:02
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mips, linux-pci, lkml


On 12/05/2017 12:59 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 05:12:05PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
quoted
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

This commit adds a memory API suitable for ascertaining the sizes of
each of the N memory controllers in a Broadcom STB chip.  Its first
user will be the Broadcom STB PCIe root complex driver, which needs
to know these sizes to properly set up DMA mappings for inbound
regions.

We cannot use memblock here or anything like what Linux provides
because it collapses adjacent regions within a larger block, and here
we actually need per-memory controller addresses and sizes, which is
why we resort to manual DT parsing.

Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile |   2 +-
 drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.c | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/soc/brcmstb/memory_api.h |  25 ++++++
 3 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.c
 create mode 100644 include/soc/brcmstb/memory_api.h
diff --git a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile
index 9120b27..4cea7b6 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Makefile
@@ -1 +1 @@
-obj-y				+= common.o biuctrl.o
+obj-y				+= common.o biuctrl.o memory.o
diff --git a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.c b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eb647ad9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/memory.c
I sort of assume based on [1] that every new file should have an SPDX
identifier ("The Linux kernel requires the precise SPDX identifier in
all source files") and that the actual text of the GPL can be omitted.

Only a few files in drivers/pci currently have an SPDX identifier.  I
don't know if that's oversight or work-in-progress or what.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204212120.484179273 at linutronix.de
This was submitted before SPDX was consistently enforced tree wide, so
yes we should fix this.

Any other comment besides that?
-- 
Florian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help