On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Sakari Ailus [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:17:52PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:

quoted

On 12/7/2017 7:40 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:04:48PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:

quoted

@@ -101,6 +103,8 @@ struct fwnode_operations {
   (*graph_get_port_parent)(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
   int (*graph_parse_endpoint)(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
                               struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint);
+  void *(*get_match_data)(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+                          struct device *dev);

You can make dev const, too.

done, I couldn't change device_get_match_data() parameter const due to
dev_fwnode() function.

                 from /local/mnt/workspace/projects/caf/kernel/drivers/base/property.c:13:

/local/mnt/workspace/projects/caf/kernel/drivers/base/property.c:1341:39: warning: passing argument 1 of 'dev_fwnode' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
  return fwnode_call_ptr_op(dev_fwnode(dev), device_get_match_data,

Right. Makes sense.

I guess it's not perhaps worth it introducing dev_fwnode_const just for
this. devices are seldom if ever const anyway.

They cannot be const.  Had they been const, it wouldn't have been
possible to register them even. :-)