Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 6 authors, 2017-12-07

[PATCH v9 3/5] perf utils: use pmu->is_uncore to detect PMU UNCORE devices

From: Jin, Yao <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-06 00:30:41
Also in: lkml


On 12/6/2017 2:42 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:35:22PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
quoted
A quick test with the new patch 'fix_json_v9_2.patch' shows it working.
I'll take this as a Tested-by: you, ok?
  
Hi Arnaldo,

I didn't do a full test for this patch and for the whole patch series.

I just do a quick test and it shows that the regression issue which was 
found in 'perf stat --per-thread' test case is disappear.

If you think it's enough for adding Tested-by, that's fine for me. :)

Thanks
Jin Yao
quoted
See the log:

root at skl:/tmp# perf stat --per-thread -p 10322 -M CPI,IPC
^C
  Performance counter stats for process id '10322':

           vmstat-10322             1,879,654      inst_retired.any #
0.8 CPI
           vmstat-10322             1,565,807      cycles
           vmstat-10322             1,879,654      inst_retired.any #
1.2 IPC
           vmstat-10322             1,565,807      cpu_clk_unhalted.thread

        2.850291804 seconds time elapsed

Thanks for fixing it quickly.

Thanks
Jin Yao

On 12/5/2017 3:23 PM, Jin, Yao wrote:
quoted
Hi,

I applied the diff but it's failed.

jinyao at skl:~/skl-ws/perf-dev/lck-4594/src$ patch -p1 < 1.pat
patching file tools/perf/util/pmu.c
patch: **** malformed patch at line 41: *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)

Could you send the patch as attachment to me in another mail thread?

to yao.jin at linux.intel.com
cc yao.jin at intel.com

Thanks
Jin Yao

On 12/5/2017 3:12 PM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index 5ad8a18..57e38fd 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -538,6 +538,34 @@ static bool pmu_is_uncore(const char *name)
 ? }

 ? /*
+ *? PMU CORE devices have different name other than cpu in sysfs on some
+ *? platforms. looking for possible sysfs files to identify as core
device.
+ */
+static int is_pmu_core(const char *name)
+{
+ struct stat st;
+ char path[PATH_MAX];
+ const char *sysfs = sysfs__mountpoint();
+
+ if (!sysfs)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Look for cpu sysfs (x86 and others) */
+ scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/bus/event_source/devices/cpu", sysfs);
+ if ((stat(path, &st) == 0) &&
+ (strncmp(name, "cpu", strlen("cpu")) == 0))
+ return 1;
+
+ /* Look for cpu sysfs (specific to arm) */
+ scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/bus/event_source/devices/%s/cpus",
+ sysfs, name);
+ if (stat(path, &st) == 0)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
 ?? * Return the CPU id as a raw string.
 ?? *
 ?? * Each architecture should provide a more precise id string that
@@ -641,7 +669,7 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head
*head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
 ?? break;
 ?? }

- if (pmu->is_uncore) {
+ if (!is_pmu_core(name)) {
 ?? /* check for uncore devices */
 ?? if (pe->pmu == NULL)
 ?? continue;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help