[PATCH 1/5] mtd: nand: use usual return values for the ->erase() hook
From: Boris Brezillon <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-30 20:51:13
Also in:
linux-mediatek
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:01:28 +0100 Miquel Raynal [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Avoid using specific defined values for checking returned status of the ->erase() hook. Instead, use usual negative error values on failure, zero otherwise. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <redacted> --- drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c | 2 +- drivers/mtd/nand/docg4.c | 7 ++++++- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c index 34008a02ddb0..3e19861a46c6 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static int denali_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, int page) irq_status = denali_wait_for_irq(denali, INTR__ERASE_COMP | INTR__ERASE_FAIL); - return irq_status & INTR__ERASE_COMP ? 0 : NAND_STATUS_FAIL; + return irq_status & INTR__ERASE_COMP ? 0 : -EIO; } static int denali_setup_data_interface(struct mtd_info *mtd, int chipnr,diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/docg4.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/docg4.c index 2436cbc71662..45c01b4b34c7 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/docg4.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/docg4.c@@ -900,6 +900,7 @@ static int docg4_erase_block(struct mtd_info *mtd, int page) struct docg4_priv *doc = nand_get_controller_data(nand); void __iomem *docptr = doc->virtadr; uint16_t g4_page; + int status; dev_dbg(doc->dev, "%s: page %04x\n", __func__, page);@@ -939,7 +940,11 @@ static int docg4_erase_block(struct mtd_info *mtd, int page) poll_status(doc); write_nop(docptr); - return nand->waitfunc(mtd, nand); + status = nand->waitfunc(mtd, nand); + if (status < 0) + return status; + + return status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL ? -EIO : 0; } static int write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *nand,diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 630048f5abdc..4d1f2bda6095 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c@@ -3077,7 +3077,7 @@ int nand_erase_nand(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr, status = chip->erase(mtd, page & chip->pagemask); /* See if block erase succeeded */ - if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) { + if (status) { pr_debug("%s: failed erase, page 0x%08x\n", __func__, page); instr->state = MTD_ERASE_FAILED;
You forgot to patch single_erase() accordingly.