[PATCH v3 3/5] misc serdev: Add w2sg0004 (gps receiver) power control driver
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2017-11-15 15:54:44
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:19 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller [off-list ref] wrote:
Add driver for Wi2Wi W2SG0004/84 GPS module connected through uart. Use serdev API hooks to monitor and forward the UART traffic to /dev/GPSn and turn on/off the module. It also detects if the module is turned on (sends data) but should be off, e.g. if it was already turned on during boot or power-on-reset. Additionally, rfkill block/unblock can be used to control an external LNA (and power down the module if not needed). The driver concept is based on code developed by NeilBrown [off-list ref] but simplified and adapted to use the new serdev API introduced in 4.11. Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <redacted>
I'm a bit confused by the concept here. Did I understand it right that this attaches to a tty_port and then registers another tty_driver with one tty_port for the first port?
+static int w2sg_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
+{
+ struct w2sg_pdata *pdata = NULL;
+ struct w2sg_data *data;
+ struct rfkill *rf_kill;
+ int err;
+ int minor;
+
+ pr_debug("%s()\n", __func__);
+
+ minor = 0;
+ if (w2sg_by_minor[minor]) {
+ pr_err("w2sg minor is already in use!\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (serdev->dev.of_node) {
+ struct device *dev = &serdev->dev;
+ enum of_gpio_flags flags;
+
+ pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pdata)
+ return -ENOMEM;This looks like it's a leftover from pre-DT days, but it doesn't actually work without DT in the current form. How about merging the contents of w2sg_pdata into w2sg_data?
+ + /* initialize the tty driver */ + data->tty_drv->owner = THIS_MODULE; + data->tty_drv->driver_name = "w2sg0004"; + data->tty_drv->name = "ttyGPS"; + data->tty_drv->major = 0; + data->tty_drv->minor_start = 0; + data->tty_drv->type = TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_SERIAL; + data->tty_drv->subtype = SERIAL_TYPE_NORMAL; + data->tty_drv->flags = TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW | TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV; + data->tty_drv->init_termios = tty_std_termios; + data->tty_drv->init_termios.c_cflag = B9600 | CS8 | CREAD | + HUPCL | CLOCAL; + /* + * optional: + * tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(&data->tty_drv->init_termios, + 115200, 115200); + * w2sg_tty_termios(&data->tty_drv->init_termios); + */ + tty_set_operations(data->tty_drv, &w2sg_serial_ops);
While I'm still not sure about why we want nested tty port, it seems that we should have only one tty_driver that gets initialized at module load time, rather than one driver structure per port.
+ /* register the tty driver */
+ err = tty_register_driver(data->tty_drv);
+ if (err) {
+ pr_err("%s - tty_register_driver failed(%d)\n",
+ __func__, err);
+ put_tty_driver(data->tty_drv);
+ goto err_rfkill;
+ }
+
+ tty_port_init(&data->port);
+ data->port.ops = &w2sg_port_ops;
+
+/*
+ * FIXME: this appears to reenter this probe() function a second time
+ * which only fails because the gpio is already assigned
+ */
+
+ data->dev = tty_port_register_device(&data->port,
+ data->tty_drv, minor, &serdev->dev);
This seems to be a result of having nested tty ports, and both
ports point to the same device.
Arnd