[PATCH V3 04/11] clk: sprd: add gate clock support
From: zhang.lyra@gmail.com (Chunyan Zhang)
Date: 2017-11-03 12:13:37
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Julien, On 3 November 2017 at 01:45, Julien Thierry [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi, On 02/11/17 06:56, Chunyan Zhang wrote:quoted
Some clocks on the Spreadtrum's SoCs are just simple gates. Add support for those clocks. Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <redacted> --- drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/clk/sprd/gate.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/clk/sprd/gate.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 161 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sprd/gate.c create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sprd/gate.hdiff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile index 74f4b80..8cd5592 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_COMMON_CLK) += clk-sprd.o clk-sprd-y += common.o +clk-sprd-y += gate.odiff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/gate.c b/drivers/clk/sprd/gate.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..831ef81 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/gate.c@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +/* + * Spreadtrum gate clock driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2017 Spreadtrum, Inc. + * Author: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com> + * + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + */ + +#include <linux/clk-provider.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> + +#include "gate.h" + +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sprd_gate_lock); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sprd_gate_lock); + +static void sprd_gate_endisable(const struct sprd_gate *sg, u32 en) +{ + const struct sprd_clk_common *common = &sg->common; + unsigned long flags = 0; + unsigned int reg; + int set = sg->flags & CLK_GATE_SET_TO_DISABLE ? 1 : 0; + + set ^= en; + + spin_lock_irqsave(common->lock, flags); + + sprd_regmap_read(common->regmap, common->reg, ®); + + if (set) + reg |= sg->op_bit; + else + reg &= ~sg->op_bit; + + sprd_regmap_write(common->regmap, common->reg, reg); + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(common->lock, flags); +} + +static void clk_sc_gate_endisable(const struct sprd_gate *sg, u32 en) +{ + const struct sprd_clk_common *common = &sg->common; + unsigned long flags = 0; + int set = sg->flags & CLK_GATE_SET_TO_DISABLE ? 1 : 0; + unsigned int offset; + + set ^= en; + + /* + * Each set/clear gate clock has three registers: + * common->reg - base register + * common->reg + offset - set register + * common->reg + 2 * offset - clear register + */ + offset = set ? sg->sc_offset : sg->sc_offset * 2; + + spin_lock_irqsave(common->lock, flags); + sprd_regmap_write(common->regmap, common->reg + offset,sg->op_bit); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(common->lock, flags); +} + +static void sprd_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct sprd_gate *sg = hw_to_sprd_gate(hw); + + if (sg->sc_offset) + clk_sc_gate_endisable(sg, 0); + else + sprd_gate_endisable(sg, 0); +} + +static int sprd_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct sprd_gate *sg = hw_to_sprd_gate(hw); + + if (sg->sc_offset) + clk_sc_gate_endisable(sg, 1); + else + sprd_gate_endisable(sg, 1); + + return 0; +} + +static int sprd_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct sprd_gate *sg = hw_to_sprd_gate(hw); + struct sprd_clk_common *common = &sg->common; + unsigned int reg; + + sprd_regmap_read(common->regmap, common->reg, ®); + + if (sg->flags & CLK_GATE_SET_TO_DISABLE) + reg ^= sg->op_bit; + + reg &= sg->op_bit; + + return reg ? 1 : 0; +} + +const struct clk_ops sprd_gate_ops = { + .disable = sprd_gate_disable, + .enable = sprd_gate_enable, + .is_enabled = sprd_gate_is_enabled, +}; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sprd_gate_ops);I think it would be better to have a set of ops for each mode, sprd_gate_ops and sprd_sc_gate_ops rather than have each function decide whether it should use set/clear registers or the base registers. So you can have a macro SPRD_GATE_CLK that doesn't take an sc_offet and selects the sprd_gate_ops and another one that SPRD_SC_GATE_CLK using sprd_sc_gate_ops that takes the sc_offset as parameter.
That makes more sense, I will revise in the next version.
Also, I feel keeping enable/disable function separate would be nicer instead of having "endisable" functions.
To avoid duplicate code, I prefer to keep the enable and disable functions together, but I agree that 'endisable' is indeed not good name for the function, I will revise the name to 'toggle' which I saw qcom clk drivers use, it might make more sense. Thanks, Chunyan
Cheers,quoted
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/gate.h b/drivers/clk/sprd/gate.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5aeb53c --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/gate.h@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +/* + * Spreadtrum gate clock driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2017 Spreadtrum, Inc. + * Author: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com> + * + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + */ + +#ifndef _SPRD_GATE_H_ +#define _SPRD_GATE_H_ + +#include "common.h" + +struct sprd_gate { + u32 op_bit; + u16 flags; + u16 sc_offset; + + struct sprd_clk_common common; +}; + +#define SPRD_GATE_CLK(_struct, _name, _parent, _reg, _sc_offset, \ + _op_bit, _flags, _gate_flags) \ + struct sprd_gate _struct = { \ + .op_bit = _op_bit, \ + .sc_offset = _sc_offset, \ + .flags = _gate_flags, \ + .common = { \ + .regmap = NULL, \ + .reg = _reg, \ + .lock = &sprd_gate_lock, \ + .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT(_name, \ + _parent, \ + &sprd_gate_ops, \ + _flags), \ + } \ + } + +static inline struct sprd_gate *hw_to_sprd_gate(const struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct sprd_clk_common *common = hw_to_sprd_clk_common(hw); + + return container_of(common, struct sprd_gate, common); +} + +void sprd_gate_helper_disable(struct sprd_clk_common *common, u32 gate); +int sprd_gate_helper_enable(struct sprd_clk_common *common, u32 gate); +int sprd_gate_helper_is_enabled(struct sprd_clk_common *common, u32gate); + +extern const struct clk_ops sprd_gate_ops; +extern spinlock_t sprd_gate_lock; + +#endif /* _SPRD_GATE_H_ */-- Julien Thierry