[PATCH v3 07/20] KVM: arm/arm64: Make timer_arm and timer_disarm helpers more generic
From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-18 16:53:23
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
On Wed, Oct 18 2017 at 6:47:50 pm BST, Christoffer Dall [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 06:05:04PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
On 23/09/17 01:41, Christoffer Dall wrote:quoted
We are about to add an additional soft timer to the arch timer state for a VCPU and would like to be able to reuse the functions to program and cancel a timer, so we make them slightly more generic and rename to make it more clear that these functions work on soft timers and not the hardware resource that this code is managing. Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <redacted> --- virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c index 8e89d63..871d8ae 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c@@ -56,26 +56,22 @@ u64 kvm_phys_timer_read(void) return timecounter->cc->read(timecounter->cc); } -static bool timer_is_armed(struct arch_timer_cpu *timer) +static bool soft_timer_is_armed(struct arch_timer_cpu *timer) { return timer->armed; } -/* timer_arm: as in "arm the timer", not as in ARM the company */ -static void timer_arm(struct arch_timer_cpu *timer, u64 ns) +static void soft_timer_start(struct hrtimer *hrt, u64 ns) { - timer->armed = true; - hrtimer_start(&timer->timer, ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), ns), + hrtimer_start(hrt, ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), ns), HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); } -static void timer_disarm(struct arch_timer_cpu *timer) +static void soft_timer_cancel(struct hrtimer *hrt, struct work_struct *work) { - if (timer_is_armed(timer)) { - hrtimer_cancel(&timer->timer); - cancel_work_sync(&timer->expired); - timer->armed = false; - } + hrtimer_cancel(hrt); + if (work)When can this happen? Something in a following patch?Yeah, sorry about that. I will point this out in the commit message.quoted
quoted
+ cancel_work_sync(work); } static irqreturn_t kvm_arch_timer_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)@@ -271,7 +267,7 @@ static void kvm_timer_emulate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return; /* The timer has not yet expired, schedule a background timer */ - timer_arm(timer, kvm_timer_compute_delta(timer_ctx)); + soft_timer_start(&timer->timer, kvm_timer_compute_delta(timer_ctx)); } /*@@ -285,7 +281,7 @@ void kvm_timer_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu); struct arch_timer_context *ptimer = vcpu_ptimer(vcpu); - BUG_ON(timer_is_armed(timer)); + BUG_ON(soft_timer_is_armed(timer)); /* * No need to schedule a background timer if any guest timer has@@ -306,13 +302,16 @@ void kvm_timer_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * The guest timers have not yet expired, schedule a background timer. * Set the earliest expiration time among the guest timers. */ - timer_arm(timer, kvm_timer_earliest_exp(vcpu)); + timer->armed = true; + soft_timer_start(&timer->timer, kvm_timer_earliest_exp(vcpu)); } void kvm_timer_unschedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu; - timer_disarm(timer); + + soft_timer_cancel(&timer->timer, &timer->expired); + timer->armed = false; } static void kvm_timer_flush_hwstate_vgic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)@@ -448,7 +447,7 @@ void kvm_timer_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * This is to cancel the background timer for the physical timer * emulation if it is set. */ - timer_disarm(timer); + soft_timer_cancel(&timer->timer, &timer->expired);timer_disarm() used to set timer->armed to false, but that's not the case any more. Don't we risk hitting the BUG_ON() in kvm_timer_schedule if we hit WFI?We do, and I just didn't hit that because this goes away at the end of the series, and I didn't vigurously test every single patch in the series (just a compile test). We actually only use the armed flag for the BUG_ON(), and I don't think we need that check really. So I suggest simply merging this logic into this patch:diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h index f0053f884b4a..d0beae98f755 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h@@ -48,9 +48,6 @@ struct arch_timer_cpu { /* Work queued with the above timer expires */ struct work_struct expired; - /* Background timer active */ - bool armed; - /* Is the timer enabled */ bool enabled; };diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c index 871d8ae52f9b..98643bc696a9 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c@@ -56,11 +56,6 @@ u64 kvm_phys_timer_read(void) return timecounter->cc->read(timecounter->cc); } -static bool soft_timer_is_armed(struct arch_timer_cpu *timer) -{ - return timer->armed; -} - static void soft_timer_start(struct hrtimer *hrt, u64 ns) { hrtimer_start(hrt, ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), ns),@@ -281,8 +276,6 @@ void kvm_timer_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu); struct arch_timer_context *ptimer = vcpu_ptimer(vcpu); - BUG_ON(soft_timer_is_armed(timer)); - /* * No need to schedule a background timer if any guest timer has * already expired, because kvm_vcpu_block will return before putting@@ -302,7 +295,6 @@ void kvm_timer_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * The guest timers have not yet expired, schedule a background timer. * Set the earliest expiration time among the guest timers. */ - timer->armed = true; soft_timer_start(&timer->timer, kvm_timer_earliest_exp(vcpu)); }@@ -311,7 +303,6 @@ void kvm_timer_unschedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu; soft_timer_cancel(&timer->timer, &timer->expired); - timer->armed = false; } static void kvm_timer_flush_hwstate_vgic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
Yes, this seems like a sensible thing to do. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.