Thread (24 messages) flat view 24 messages, 4 authors, 2017-10-17
DORMANTno replies

Revision v3 of 17 in this series.

Revisions (17)
  1. rfc [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v2 [diff vs current]
  4. v1 [diff vs current]
  5. v1 [diff vs current]
  6. v1 [diff vs current]
  7. v1 [diff vs current]
  8. v2 [diff vs current]
  9. v1 [diff vs current]
  10. v2 [diff vs current]
  11. v3 [diff vs current]
  12. v3 [diff vs current]
  13. v3 [diff vs current]
  14. v3 [diff vs current]
  15. v3 [diff vs current]
  16. v3 [diff vs current]
  17. v3 current

[PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: NOMMU: MPU updates

From: Vladimir Murzin <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-17 15:02:20

On 17/10/17 15:56, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:56PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:13:36PM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
quoted
On 17/10/17 15:05, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
quoted
2017-09-25 11:05 GMT+02:00 Vladimir Murzin [off-list ref]:
quoted
Hi,

This is an update of the existent MPU code which consist set of
clean-ups and enhancements. The most significant changes are in the
way how MPU settings sync-up for secondaries (PATCH 3/8), more
flexible layout for memory (PATCH 7/8) and support for XIP (PATCH
8/8). Since there is no in-tree user of MPU, support for M-class has
been added (PATCH 6/8).

There is also practical benefit of patch set:

"These MPU patches introduce a nice feature that it simplifies the
bootloader: do not need to setup the MPU, for example for coherent DMA
region, which is described in device-tree too." Andr?s Szemz?

Changelog:
           v2 -> v3
              - fixed support for XIP (PATCH 8/8)
              - rebased on 4.14-rc2

           v1 -> v2
              - support for XIP (PATCH 8/8)
              - rebased on 4.13-rc1

        RFC v2 -> v1
               - dropped RFC tag
               - Tested-by from Andr?s
               - rebased on 4.12-rc5

           RFC -> RFC v2
               - fixed MPU enable for v7m (PATCH 6/7)

Thanks!
for the whole serie on stm32f4 and stm32f7:

Tested-by: Benjamin Gaignard <redacted>
Thanks for giving it a try!

The series is already in Russell's patch system, so I dunno
how to add your Tested-by, maybe Russell can made an update
when he pull patches in his tree...
Applied, along with the tested-by, and with the fixup patch folded.

However, I notice that with "Szemz? Andr?s" name, the ? character has
been replaced by a "?" somewhere along the lines (and my VT console
can't even display it, so (a) I've no idea what character it's
supposed to be, and (b) I can't cut'n'paste it either - as illustrated
by my pasting above making it come out as a rectangular block.)

The problem I have is that if I push these patches out, as soon as I
do, I can't fix this up, because it's the "devel-stable" branch - and
the promise I make to everyone is that branch is never rebased (which
is why it has the -stable suffix.)  Once commits are published in that
branch, they're set in stone.

From what I can tell, the patches were emailed to the patch system,
which means it would've gone through perl's Unicode::Map8 - internally
the patch system uses UTF-8 to store the summary and description,
while preserving the patch as a byte stream.  Your emails to the list
claim to be UTF-8, so it should've been a no-op.  So, don't know what
has happened, and I can't fix it at the moment, not even in the actual
commits.

So, I won't be pushing this out, nor will I be marking the patches as
applied in the patch system until I have some kind of solution.
Okay, seems not to be the patch system's email parsing - saving one of
your messages from the list and feeding that into the mail parser gives
correct results - utf-8 bytes of 0xc5 0x91, which would've been placed
into mysql over a connection using utf-8 encoding.

What I know is that reading it out of mysql over a utf-8 encoding gives
a '?' (0x3f) for that character.  What I don't know is whether it's
mysql having this behaviour, or whether your message was received with
the character already converted to a '?'.
Patches where send one by one with (smtp related options are omitted)

git send-email --suppress-cc=all --no-thread --to patches at armlinux.org.uk

If you want I can send a patch to you directly, so you can see if it
arrives converted or not.

Cheers
Vladimir
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help