On 13/10/17 20:05, Will Deacon wrote:

Hi Robin,

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:44:24PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:

quoted

Since Nate reported a reasonable performance boost from the out-of-line
MSI polling in v1 [1], I've now implemented the equivalent for cons
polling as well - that has been boot-tested on D05 with some trivial I/O
and at least doesn't seem to lock up or explode. There's also a little
cosmetic tweaking to make the patches a bit cleaner as a series.

Robin.

[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org/msg19657.html

Robin Murphy (5):
  iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Specialise CMD_SYNC handling
  iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Forget about cmdq-sync interrupt
  iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use CMD_SYNC completion interrupt
  iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Poll for CMD_SYNC outside cmdq lock
  iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use burst-polling for sync completion

What's this final mythical patch about? I don't see it in the series.

It's in the place 5/5 would be, I just tagged it as [RFT] since I have
zero evidence whether it's worth the bother or not.

Anyway, the first two patches look fine to me, but this doesn't apply
on top of my iommu/devel branch so they will need rebasing.

Will do.

Thanks for the review,
Robin.