Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 6 authors, 2017-11-09

[PATCH v10 0/9] LPC: legacy ISA I/O support

From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-27 16:45:57
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-pci, lkml

From: Gabriele Paoloni
Sent: 27 October 2017 17:11
This patchset supports the IPMI-bt device attached to the Low-Pin-Count
interface implemented on Hisilicon Hip06/Hip07 SoC.
                        -----------
                        | LPC host|
                        |         |
                        -----------
                             |
                _____________V_______________LPC
                  |                       |
                  V                       V
                                     ------------
                                     |  BT(ipmi)|
                                     ------------

When master accesses those peripherals beneath the Hip06/Hip07 LPC, a specific
LPC driver is needed to make LPC host generate the standard LPC I/O cycles with
the target peripherals'I/O port addresses. But on curent arm64 world, there is
no real I/O accesses. All the I/O operations through in/out accessors are based
on MMIO ranges; on Hip06/Hip07 LPC the I/O accesses are performed through driver
specific accessors rather than MMIO.
To solve this issue and keep the relevant existing peripherals' drivers untouched,
this patchset:
   - introduces a generic I/O space management framework, LIBIO, to support I/O
     operations on host controllers operating either on MMIO buses or on buses
     requiring specific driver I/O accessors;
   - redefines the in/out accessors to provide a unified interface for both MMIO
     and driver specific I/O operations. Using LIBIO, th call of in/out() from
     the host children drivers, such as ipmi-si, will be redirected to the
     corresponding device-specific I/O hooks to perform the I/O accesses.

 Based on this patch-set, all the I/O accesses to Hip06/Hip07 LPC peripherals can
 be supported without any changes on the existing ipmi-si driver.
FWIW my thoughts on this are WTF!

Looks to me horribly over complicated and over generalised.

Surely is it could be done the same way that x86 does IO cycles?
So you encode the information into the 'address' the driver passes
to ioread16() (etc) to allow it to do either a normal bus cycle or
the indirect cycle onto the external bus.

So you have one kernel option that makes these real functions.

	David
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help