On 9/21/17 7:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:

I guess gpio_valid_mask would take precedence over irq_valid_mask.
I.e if the GPIO is not valid then the IRQ is per definition not valid either.

Since it is a new thing, we can simply define a semantic like that
and document it.

So what about my current patches?  I hope you're not asking me to 
rewrite them again.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.