[PATCH] mmc: sdhci-xenon: Fix clock resource by adding an optional bus clock
From: Gregory CLEMENT <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-29 09:22:07
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, stable
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2017-09-30 · Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-xenon: Fix clock resource by adding an optional bus clock · Jisheng Zhang <hidden>
- 2017-09-30 · Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-xenon: Fix clock resource by adding an optional bus clock · Ziji Hu <hidden>
- 2017-09-29 · Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-xenon: Fix clock resource by adding an optional bus clock · Thomas Petazzoni <hidden>
- 2017-09-29 · Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-xenon: Fix clock resource by adding an optional bus clock · Gregory CLEMENT <hidden>
- 2017-09-29 · Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-xenon: Fix clock resource by adding an optional bus clock · Jisheng Zhang <hidden>
Hi Thomas, On ven., sept. 29 2017, Thomas Petazzoni [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello, On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:13:00 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
- clock-names: Array of names corresponding to clocks property. The input clock for Xenon IP core should be named as "core". + The input clock for the AXI bus must be named as "axi".Is "bus" more suitable?I find bus too vague.Actually no, I believe "bus" is more common. Indeed, you could have the same IP, attached to a different interconnect I guess.quoted
quoted
quoted
/* * Link Xenon specific mmc_host_ops function,@@ -491,9 +493,20 @@ static int xenon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (err) goto free_pltfm; + priv->axi_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "axi"); + if (IS_ERR(priv->axi_clk)) {-EPROBE_DEFER handling ?
See http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-September/533510.html Gregory -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com