Hi Maxime,

On 26/09/2017 15:00, Maxime Ripard wrote:

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:17:12PM +0000, Quentin Schulz wrote:

quoted

+static const struct axp20x_desc_pin axp209_pins[] = {
+	AXP20X_PIN(AXP20X_PINCTRL_PIN(0, "GPIO0"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_out"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x2, "gpio_in"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x3, "ldo"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x4, "adc")),
+	AXP20X_PIN(AXP20X_PINCTRL_PIN(1, "GPIO1"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_out"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x2, "gpio_in"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x3, "ldo"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x4, "adc")),
+	AXP20X_PIN(AXP20X_PINCTRL_PIN(2, "GPIO2"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_out"),
+		   AXP20X_FUNCTION(0x2, "gpio_in")),
+};

If all the functions are the same, and at the same offset, can't we
just hardcode it, instead of having (and duplicate) all the logic
below?

AXP20X_PIN(AXP20X_PINCTRL_PIN(0, "GPIO0"),
		AXP20X_GPIO_OUT,
		AXP20X_GPIO_IN,
		AXP20X_LDO,
		AXP20X_ADC))

That's what you mean?

quoted

+	pctrl_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pctrl_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pctrl_desc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	pctrl_desc->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
+	pctrl_desc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+	pctrl_desc->pins = pins;
+	pctrl_desc->npins = gpio->desc->npins;
+	pctrl_desc->pctlops = &axp20x_pctrl_ops;
+	pctrl_desc->pmxops = &axp20x_pmx_ops;

The strict flag needs to be set too in order to avoid concurrent uses
of GPIO and other functions.

Strict is a property of pinmux_ops struct (pmxops) and it is set.

Thanks,
Quentin
-- 
Quentin Schulz, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170926/e49a811a/attachment-0001.sig>