On 20/09/2017 at 10:30:31 +0200, Romain Izard wrote:

2017-09-19 17:25 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones [off-list ref]:

quoted

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Nicolas Ferre wrote:

quoted

On 15/09/2017 at 16:04, Romain Izard wrote:

quoted

The controller used by a flexcom module is configured at boot, and left
alone after this. As the configuration will be lost after backup mode,
restore the state of the flexcom driver on resume.

Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <redacted>

Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
On sama5d2 Xplained board (i2c0 from flexcom 4).
and obviously:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

Thanks Romain!

Regards,

quoted

---
 drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

This is the first time I've seen this patch.  Why's that?

As the patchset covers many subsystems, get_maintainers.pl provided a
very long list of both developpers and mailing lists (28). I thought it
was a good idea to shorten it a little. Bad idea. Sorry.

I think the correct way of handling that would have been to send each
patch to the proper subsystem as there are no dependency here.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com