[PATCH -tip 2/4] arm: Cleanup in_exception_text() and move it in asm/sections.h
From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: 2017-09-03 22:23:49
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 04:15:00PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Cleanup in_exception_text() using memory_contains() and move it in asm/sections.h from asm/trap.h because section symbols and memory_contains() are defined in asm/sections.h. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> --- arch/arm/include/asm/sections.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/traps.h | 22 +--------------------- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/sections.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/sections.h index 803bbf2b20b8..76791cfc7619 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/sections.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/sections.h@@ -4,5 +4,22 @@ #include <asm-generic/sections.h> extern char _exiprom[]; +extern char __exception_text_start[], __exception_text_end[]; + +/** + * in_exception_text - check if an address is in exception_text or + * irqentry_text + * @addr: virtual address to be checked + * + * Returns: true if the address specified by @addr is in the exception_text or + * irqentry_text, false otherwise. + */ +static inline bool in_exception_text(unsigned long addr) +{ + return memory_contains(__exception_text_start, __exception_text_end, + (void *)addr, 0) || + memory_contains(__irqentry_text_start, __irqentry_text_end, + (void *)addr, 0);
Patch looks buggy - where is __irqentry_text_start and __irqentry_text_end declared? -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up