[PATCH] RM64: dts: ls208xa: Add iommu-map property for pci
From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
Date: 2017-09-01 10:58:43
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 01/09/17 11:13, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: linux-kernel-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel- owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Bharat Bhushan Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 4:53 PM To: Marc Zyngier [off-list ref]; robh+dt at kernel.org; Mark Rutland [off-list ref]; will.deacon at arm.com; oss at buserror.net; Gang Liu [off-list ref]; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux- kernel at vger.kernel.org; catalin.marinas at arm.com Subject: RE: [PATCH] RM64: dts: ls208xa: Add iommu-map property for pciquoted
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:marc.zyngier at arm.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 4:20 PM To: Bharat Bhushan [off-list ref]; robh+dt at kernel.org;Markquoted
Rutland [off-list ref]; will.deacon at arm.com;oss at buserror.net;quoted
Gang Liu [off-list ref]; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux- kernel at vger.kernel.org; catalin.marinas at arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] RM64: dts: ls208xa: Add iommu-map property for pci [Fixing Mark's address...] On 31/08/17 11:41, Bharat Bhushan wrote:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:marc.zyngier at arm.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 3:02 PM To: Bharat Bhushan [off-list ref]; robh+dt at kernel.org; ark.rutland at arm.com; will.deacon at arm.com; oss at buserror.net; GangLiuquoted
quoted
[off-list ref]; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; catalin.marinas at arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] RM64: dts: ls208xa: Add iommu-map property for pci On 31/08/17 10:23, Bharat Bhushan wrote:quoted
This patch adds iommu-map property for PCIe, which enables SMMU for these devices on LS208xA devices. Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <redacted> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi index 94cdd30..67cf605 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ num-lanes = <4>; bus-range = <0x0 0xff>; msi-parent = <&its>; + iommu-map = <0 &smmu 0 1>; /* This is fixed-up byu-boot */ What does this do when your version of u-boot doesn't fill this in foryou?quoted
quoted
Good question, frankly I have not thought of this case before. But if we pass length = 0 in above property then no fixup happen with happen with older u-boot. In this case of_iommu_configure() will return NULL iommu-ops and it switch to swio-tlb. Will that work?I really don't like this. You rely on having invalid data in the DT, and that seems just wrong. Why can't u-boot just generate that property, and we leave the DT alone?We do not have smmu phandle allowing uboot to generate this.quoted
Or even better, you provide the right information for the few boards that are based on this SoC, not relying on u-boot for anything that is in the kernel tree?On our platforms we have a h/w table which converts RID->Device-Id. I will check what will happen if that table is not initialized, can RID be equal to device-id is that case. If that will be allowed than we can give right information that will work with u-boot not updating this property.U-boot uses a stream-id allocator and programs the h/w mapping table (rid to sid mapping table). Also it updates iommu-map property accordingly. But If u-boot does not update iommu-map than we cannot have a valid full proof solution as stream-id allocation can change in u-boot. So the other option of u-boot generating this entry seems correct solution. This requires u-boot to know iommu-phandle, something similar to "msi-parent" used for "msi-map" Device-tree binding need change to add iommu-phandle/iommu-parent for this.
From what I know of this hardware, it's going to be rather difficult to
concoct a DT which reflects the initial hardware state accurately *and* works correctly without updating u-boot in lockstep. IIRC, I believe the accurate description for an unprogrammed LUT would be "everything comes out on the default ID, which defaults to 0", i.e.: iommu-map-mask = <0x0>; iommu-map = <0x0 &smmu 0x0 0x1>; (assuming the SMMU has stream-id-mask set appropriately too) That's OK except if u-boot updates the map without removing the mask, whereupon things will go wrong, and I guess that would be the case with current u-boot :( However, the existing MSI description is already bogus - if u-boot didn't program the LUT, the ITS driver would treat the invalid "msi-parent" property as this: msi-map = <0x0 &its 0x0 0xffff>; which means that nobody other than 0:0.0 has working MSIs anyway. If you want an obviously-invalid placeholder equivalent to the use of "msi-parent" then I'd suggest just: iommus = <&smmu>; which would be ignored by Linux for PCI devices, so provided you didn't disable bypass at the SMMU things might in theory still work in the "u-boot does nothing" case. Otherwise, the implied identity map is probably slightly preferable to the unit-length map, i.e.: iommu-map = <0x0 &smmu 0x0 0xffff>; which is at least equally broken as MSIs in the same situation. Robin.