[PATCH 11/27] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
Date: 2017-08-22 17:19:59
Also in:
kvmarm, linux-arch
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 05:21:19PM +0100, Alex Benn?e wrote:
Dave Martin [off-list ref] writes:
[...]
quoted
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ struct thread_struct { unsigned long tp2_value; #endif struct fpsimd_state fpsimd_state; + void *sve_state; /* SVE registers, if any */ + u16 sve_vl; /* SVE vector length */sve_vl is implicitly cast to unsigned int bellow - it should be consistent.
Agreed -- I think this can just be unsigned int here, which is the type I use everywhere except when encoding the vector length in the signal frame and ptrace data. During development, there was an additional flags field here (now merged into the thread_info flags). u16 was big enough for the largest architectural vector length, so it seemed "tidy" to make both u16s. Elsewhere, this created a risk of overflow if you try to compute say the size of the whole register file from a u16, so I generally used unsigned int for local variables in functions that handle the vl.
Given the allocation functions rely on sve_vl being valid it might be worth noting where this is set/live from?
Agreed, I need to look more closely at exactly how to justify the soundness of this in order to thin out BUG_ONs. If you need any pointers, please ping me. In the meantime, I would rather not colour your judgement by infecting you with my assumptions ;)
quoted
unsigned long fault_address; /* fault info */ unsigned long fault_code; /* ESR_EL1 value */ struct debug_info debug; /* debugging */diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h index 46c3b93..1a4b30b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h<snip> And I see there are other comments from Ard.
Yup, I've already picked those up. I'll be posting a v2 with feedback applied once I've reviewed the existing BUG_ON()s -- should happen sometime this week. Cheers ---Dave