Thread (25 messages) flat view 25 messages, 6 authors, 2017-08-07
STALE3337d

[PATCH v2 3/4] drm/bridge: dw-hdmi: add cec driver

From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
Date: 2017-08-02 14:22:54
Also in: dri-devel

Hi Hans,

On Wednesday 02 Aug 2017 15:34:33 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 08/02/17 15:27, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:14:34PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
quoted
On Wednesday 02 Aug 2017 08:47:23 Hans Verkuil wrote:
quoted
On 08/02/2017 12:32 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
quoted
quoted
+
+	cec_register_cec_notifier(cec->adap, cec->notify);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int dw_hdmi_cec_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct dw_hdmi_cec *cec = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	cec_unregister_adapter(cec->adap);
+	cec_notifier_put(cec->notify);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver dw_hdmi_cec_driver = {
+	.probe	= dw_hdmi_cec_probe,
+	.remove	= dw_hdmi_cec_remove,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "dw-hdmi-cec",
+	},
+};
+module_platform_driver(dw_hdmi_cec_driver);
Is there a particular reason why this has to be a separate module
instead of simply calling the CEC init/cleanup functions directly from
the main dw-hdmi driver ?
Not all SoCs that use dw-hdmi also use the dw-hdmi CEC implementation.
Some use their own implementation (amlogic).
Lovely. Of course we need to reinvent the wheel every time, where would
the fun be otherwise ?
quoted
So by implementing the cec-notifier in the dw-hdmi driver and keeping
dw-hdmi CEC separate you can easily choose whether or not you want to
use this CEC driver or another SoC CEC driver.
I'm certainly fine with such a split, but I don't think it requires a
separate platform_driver. We could use a similar approach as with the
HDMI PHY that can also differ between SoCs. The PHY is identified at
runtime when possible, and the SoC-specific glue code can override that
with a few data fields and function pointers.
Excuse me if I completely lose interest in reworking the driver at this
point, as it's enough of an effort to follow the churn in CEC from one
kernel version to another.  I'm not about to rewrite the driver and
restart the review cycle from scratch and then have several iterations
of having to update it as CEC continues to evolve.

Let's get this driver in mainline, and then if we want further changes
we can do that later.
+1

I also don't think the phy idea applies here. CEC implementations range from
tightly coupled to the HDMI implementation to a completely independent i2c
device that is unrelated to any HDMI receiver/transmitter. And various
shades in between those extremes.
Then it should be even simpler. Instead of creating a separate platform device 
for the DW HDMI CEC, we can just call the DW HDMI CEC driver init/cleanup 
functions directly when the IP core implements CEC. When it doesn't, a 
separate device will be described in DT (at least to my understanding, 
otherwise where would it come from ?) and a separate driver would handle it.
The only thing that is needed is that the CEC device needs to be informed
when an EDID is read and when the hotplug disappears. The CEC notifier does
just that and it is already in use, so it is nothing new. No need to rework
this.
The notifier implementation in patch 1/4 looks good to me (except for the 
missing cec_notifier_put() call that I mentioned in my review).

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help