[PATCH 1/2] arm64: syscallno is secretly an int, make it official
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
Date: 2017-08-01 12:47:02
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 12:36:47PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:41:43PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:quoted
The upper 32 bits of the syscallno field in struct pt_regs are handled inconsistently, being sometimes zero extended and sometimes sign-extended. The reason for this appears to be that they are not intentionally significant at all. Currently, the only place I can find where those bits are significant is in calling trace_sys_enter(), which may be unintentional: for example, if a compat tracer attempts to cancel a syscall by passing -1 to (COMPAT_)PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL at the syscall-enter-stop, it will be traced as syscall 4294967295 rather than -1 as might be expected (and as occurs for a native tracer doing the same thing). Elsewhere, reads of syscallno cast it to an int or truncate it. There's also a conspicuous amount of code and casting to bodge around the fact that although semantically an int, syscallno is stored as a u64. Let's not pretend any more. In order to preserve the stp x instruction that stores the syscall number in entry.S, this patch special-cases the layout of struct pt_regs for big endian so that the newly 32-bit syscallno field maps onto the low bits of the stored value. This is not beautiful, but benchmarking of the getpid syscall on Juno suggests indicates a minor slowdown if the stp is split into an stp x and stp w. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h index 11403fd..21c87dc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h@@ -116,7 +116,14 @@ struct pt_regs { }; }; u64 orig_x0; - u64 syscallno; +#ifdef __AARCH64EB__ + u32 unused2; + s32 syscallno; +#else + s32 syscallno; + u32 unused2; +#endif + u64 orig_addr_limit; u64 unused; // maintain 16 byte alignmentThis isn't a UAPI struct, so we could juggle these about a bit to put all the unused padding at the end.
In the __AARCH64EB__ case syscallno still needs to be padded up to an odd 32-bit boundary, so we need padding before it in that case; also we'd still need the #ifdef either way, and the struct is already intentionally a multiple of 16 bytes to align it on the stack. So I'm not sure what we'd save here (?) I could put orig_addr_limit before (padded) syscallno, but I'm not sure that's better. Cheers ---Dave