On 08/09, Linus Walleij wrote:

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 08/08, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

This bit is pin control, and needs to be carefully managed by the
new pin control driver.

Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>

Fixes tag?

It's not a fix, it'd just that we move the responsibility of managing the
pin from the clock driver to the pin control driver.

I initially thought the Gemini would not need a separate pin control
driver because it was "simple" ... so these bits could be handled here
and there among the peripherals. Little did I know. Mea culpa.

quoted

Does this need to be merged now as a critical fix? Or we can wait
on it for next release?

Just put it in for the next release, thanks!

Alright. Thanks!

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project