Thread (118 messages) 118 messages, 6 authors, 2017-09-06

[PATCH v3 41/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Wire mapping/unmapping of VLPIs in VFIO irq bypass

From: Christoffer Dall <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-30 19:59:33
Also in: kvm, kvmarm, lkml

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:53:30PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 30/08/17 12:46, Christoffer Dall wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:28:08AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted
On 26/08/17 20:48, Christoffer Dall wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 06:26:19PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted
Let's use the irq bypass mechanism introduced for platform device
interrupts to intercept the virtual PCIe endpoint configuration
and establish our LPI->VLPI mapping.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
---
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h      |   8 ++++
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c          |  27 ++++++++----
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 359eeffe9857..050f78d4fb42 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -367,4 +367,12 @@ int kvm_vgic_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
 void kvm_vgic_unset_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
 			       unsigned int vintid);
 
+struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry;
+
+int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int irq,
+			       struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry);
+
+int kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int irq,
+				 struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry);
+
 #endif /* __KVM_ARM_VGIC_H */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index ebab6c29e3be..6803ea27c47d 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -1457,11 +1457,16 @@ int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
 		container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
 
-	if (prod->type != IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PLATFORM)
+	switch (prod->type) {
+	case IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PLATFORM:
+		return kvm_vgic_set_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
+					       irqfd->gsi + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
+	case IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PCI_MSI:
+		return kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
+						  &irqfd->irq_entry);
+	default:
 		return 0;
-
-	return kvm_vgic_set_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
-				       irqfd->gsi + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
+	}
 }
 void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 				      struct irq_bypass_producer *prod)
@@ -1469,11 +1474,17 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
 		container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
 
-	if (prod->type != IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PLATFORM)
-		return;
+	switch (prod->type) {
+	case IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PLATFORM:
+		kvm_vgic_unset_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
+					  irqfd->gsi + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
+		break;
 
-	kvm_vgic_unset_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
-				  irqfd->gsi + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
+	case IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PCI_MSI:
+		kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
+					     &irqfd->irq_entry);
+		break;
+	}
 }
 
 void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index 207e1fda0dcd..338c86c5159f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -72,3 +72,106 @@ void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm)
 	its_vm->nr_vpes = 0;
 	its_vm->vpes = NULL;
 }
+
+static struct vgic_its *vgic_get_its(struct kvm *kvm,
+				     struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry)
+{
+	struct kvm_msi msi  = (struct kvm_msi) {
+		.address_lo	= irq_entry->msi.address_lo,
+		.address_hi	= irq_entry->msi.address_hi,
+		.data		= irq_entry->msi.data,
+		.flags		= irq_entry->msi.flags,
+		.devid		= irq_entry->msi.devid,
+	};
+
+	/*
+	 * Get a reference on the LPI. If NULL, this is not a valid
+	 * translation for any of our vITSs.
+	 */
+	return vgic_msi_to_its(kvm, &msi);
+}
+
+int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int virq,
+			       struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry)
+{
+	struct vgic_its *its;
+	struct vgic_irq *irq;
+	struct its_vlpi_map map;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!vgic_is_v4_capable(kvm))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Get the ITS, and escape early on error (not a valid
+	 * doorbell for any of our vITSs).
+	 */
+	its = vgic_get_its(kvm, irq_entry);
+	if (IS_ERR(its))
+		return 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&its->its_lock);
+
+	/* Perform then actual DevID/EventID -> LPI translation. */
+	ret = vgic_its_resolve_lpi(kvm, its, irq_entry->msi.devid,
+				   irq_entry->msi.data, &irq);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	/*
+	 * Emit the mapping request. If it fails, the ITS probably
+	 * isn't v4 compatible, so let's silently bail out. Holding
+	 * the ITS lock should ensure that nothing can modify the
+	 * target vcpu.
+	 */
+	map = (struct its_vlpi_map) {
+		.vm		= &kvm->arch.vgic.its_vm,
+		.vintid		= irq->intid,
+		.db_enabled	= true,
+		.vpe_idx	= irq->target_vcpu->vcpu_id,
This is just wrong. We cannot assume that the vcpu_id has anything to do
with the vpe_idx. It happens to be the same thing now, but the two things
should be clearly disconnected.

I suggest the following (untested):
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index cf5d6e2de6b8..0146e004401a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -251,13 +251,27 @@ static void dump_routing(int virq, struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entr
 
 }
 
+static int vgic_v4_vcpu_to_index(struct its_vm *its_vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < its_vm->nr_vpes; i++) {
+		struct its_vpe *vpe = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe;
+
+		if (its_vm->vpes[i] == vpe)
+			return i;
+	}
+
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+
Stupid question: Can we change the struct its_vlpi_map to contain a
vpe pointer or in stead of or in addition to the index?
This is obviously the right solution, because the *index* of the VPE 
doesn't really matter for a map/unmap (it only matters for doorbell 
operations, and that's a very different code path).

I came up with the following (untested, again), which is much more
appealing:
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index b47097a3e4b4..0607541fcafc 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ static void its_send_vmapti(struct its_device *dev, u32 id)
 	struct its_vlpi_map *map = &dev->event_map.vlpi_maps[id];
 	struct its_cmd_desc desc;
 
-	desc.its_vmapti_cmd.vpe = map->vm->vpes[map->vpe_idx];
+	desc.its_vmapti_cmd.vpe = map->vpe;
 	desc.its_vmapti_cmd.dev = dev;
 	desc.its_vmapti_cmd.virt_id = map->vintid;
 	desc.its_vmapti_cmd.event_id = id;
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static void its_send_vmovi(struct its_device *dev, u32 id)
 	struct its_vlpi_map *map = &dev->event_map.vlpi_maps[id];
 	struct its_cmd_desc desc;
 
-	desc.its_vmovi_cmd.vpe = map->vm->vpes[map->vpe_idx];
+	desc.its_vmovi_cmd.vpe = map->vpe;
 	desc.its_vmovi_cmd.dev = dev;
 	desc.its_vmovi_cmd.event_id = id;
 	desc.its_vmovi_cmd.db_enabled = map->db_enabled;
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
index 52661b838821..58a4d89aa82c 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
@@ -62,15 +62,15 @@ struct its_vpe {
  * irq_set_vcpu_affinity().
  *
  * @vm:		Pointer to the GICv4 notion of a VM
+ * @vpe:	Pointer to the GICv4 notion of a virtual CPU (VPE)
  * @vintid:	Virtual LPI number
  * @db_enabled:	Is the VPE doorbell to be generated?
- * @vpe_idx:	Index (0-based) of the VPE in this VM. Not the vpe_id!
  */
 struct its_vlpi_map {
 	struct its_vm		*vm;
+	struct its_vpe		*vpe;
 	u32			vintid;
 	bool			db_enabled;
-	u16			vpe_idx;
 };
 
 enum its_vcpu_info_cmd_type {
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index d790d0c74b8b..6ba3d73e0f70 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
-		map.vpe_idx = vcpu->vcpu_id;
+		map.vpe = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe;
 
 		return its_map_vlpi(ite->irq->host_irq, &map);
 	}
@@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 			struct its_vlpi_map map;
 
 			if (!its_get_vlpi(irq->host_irq, &map)) {
-				map.vpe_idx = vcpu2->vcpu_id;
+				map.vpe = &vcpu2->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe;
 				its_map_vlpi(irq->host_irq, &map);
 			}
 		}
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index cf5d6e2de6b8..6ece88322013 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -288,9 +288,9 @@ int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int virq,
 	 */
 	map = (struct its_vlpi_map) {
 		.vm		= &kvm->arch.vgic.its_vm,
+		.vpe		= &irq->target_vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe,
 		.vintid		= irq->intid,
 		.db_enabled	= true,
-		.vpe_idx	= irq->target_vcpu->vcpu_id,
 	};
 
 	if (its_map_vlpi(virq, &map))
Maybe I'll introduce a vcpu_to_vpe() helper, but it already looks much 
better to me...
Yes, indeed.  Looks good to me as well.

The only thing that makes me slightly nervous is the use of target_vcpu,
but I think we rely on it never being NULL for LPIs elsewhere in the
code, so we should be fine.

Thanks,
-Christoffer
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help