[PATCH v3 41/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Wire mapping/unmapping of VLPIs in VFIO irq bypass
From: Christoffer Dall <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-30 19:59:33
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, lkml
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:53:30PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 30/08/17 12:46, Christoffer Dall wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:28:08AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
On 26/08/17 20:48, Christoffer Dall wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 06:26:19PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
Let's use the irq bypass mechanism introduced for platform device interrupts to intercept the virtual PCIe endpoint configuration and establish our LPI->VLPI mapping. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <redacted> --- include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 8 ++++ virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 27 ++++++++---- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h index 359eeffe9857..050f78d4fb42 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h@@ -367,4 +367,12 @@ int kvm_vgic_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq, void kvm_vgic_unset_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq, unsigned int vintid); +struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry; + +int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry); + +int kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry); + #endif /* __KVM_ARM_VGIC_H */diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c index ebab6c29e3be..6803ea27c47d 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c@@ -1457,11 +1457,16 @@ int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd = container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer); - if (prod->type != IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PLATFORM) + switch (prod->type) { + case IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PLATFORM: + return kvm_vgic_set_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, + irqfd->gsi + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); + case IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PCI_MSI: + return kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, + &irqfd->irq_entry); + default: return 0; - - return kvm_vgic_set_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, - irqfd->gsi + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); + } } void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons, struct irq_bypass_producer *prod)@@ -1469,11 +1474,17 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd = container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer); - if (prod->type != IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PLATFORM) - return; + switch (prod->type) { + case IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PLATFORM: + kvm_vgic_unset_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, + irqfd->gsi + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); + break; - kvm_vgic_unset_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, - irqfd->gsi + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); + case IRQ_BYPASS_VFIO_PCI_MSI: + kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, + &irqfd->irq_entry); + break; + } } void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c index 207e1fda0dcd..338c86c5159f 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c@@ -72,3 +72,106 @@ void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm) its_vm->nr_vpes = 0; its_vm->vpes = NULL; } + +static struct vgic_its *vgic_get_its(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry) +{ + struct kvm_msi msi = (struct kvm_msi) { + .address_lo = irq_entry->msi.address_lo, + .address_hi = irq_entry->msi.address_hi, + .data = irq_entry->msi.data, + .flags = irq_entry->msi.flags, + .devid = irq_entry->msi.devid, + }; + + /* + * Get a reference on the LPI. If NULL, this is not a valid + * translation for any of our vITSs. + */ + return vgic_msi_to_its(kvm, &msi); +} + +int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int virq, + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entry) +{ + struct vgic_its *its; + struct vgic_irq *irq; + struct its_vlpi_map map; + int ret; + + if (!vgic_is_v4_capable(kvm)) + return 0; + + /* + * Get the ITS, and escape early on error (not a valid + * doorbell for any of our vITSs). + */ + its = vgic_get_its(kvm, irq_entry); + if (IS_ERR(its)) + return 0; + + mutex_lock(&its->its_lock); + + /* Perform then actual DevID/EventID -> LPI translation. */ + ret = vgic_its_resolve_lpi(kvm, its, irq_entry->msi.devid, + irq_entry->msi.data, &irq); + if (ret) + goto out; + + /* + * Emit the mapping request. If it fails, the ITS probably + * isn't v4 compatible, so let's silently bail out. Holding + * the ITS lock should ensure that nothing can modify the + * target vcpu. + */ + map = (struct its_vlpi_map) { + .vm = &kvm->arch.vgic.its_vm, + .vintid = irq->intid, + .db_enabled = true, + .vpe_idx = irq->target_vcpu->vcpu_id,This is just wrong. We cannot assume that the vcpu_id has anything to do with the vpe_idx. It happens to be the same thing now, but the two things should be clearly disconnected. I suggest the following (untested):diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c index cf5d6e2de6b8..0146e004401a 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c@@ -251,13 +251,27 @@ static void dump_routing(int virq, struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *irq_entr } +static int vgic_v4_vcpu_to_index(struct its_vm *its_vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < its_vm->nr_vpes; i++) { + struct its_vpe *vpe = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe; + + if (its_vm->vpes[i] == vpe) + return i; + } + + return -ENODEV; +} +Stupid question: Can we change the struct its_vlpi_map to contain a vpe pointer or in stead of or in addition to the index?This is obviously the right solution, because the *index* of the VPE doesn't really matter for a map/unmap (it only matters for doorbell operations, and that's a very different code path). I came up with the following (untested, again), which is much more appealing:diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c index b47097a3e4b4..0607541fcafc 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c@@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ static void its_send_vmapti(struct its_device *dev, u32 id) struct its_vlpi_map *map = &dev->event_map.vlpi_maps[id]; struct its_cmd_desc desc; - desc.its_vmapti_cmd.vpe = map->vm->vpes[map->vpe_idx]; + desc.its_vmapti_cmd.vpe = map->vpe; desc.its_vmapti_cmd.dev = dev; desc.its_vmapti_cmd.virt_id = map->vintid; desc.its_vmapti_cmd.event_id = id;@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static void its_send_vmovi(struct its_device *dev, u32 id) struct its_vlpi_map *map = &dev->event_map.vlpi_maps[id]; struct its_cmd_desc desc; - desc.its_vmovi_cmd.vpe = map->vm->vpes[map->vpe_idx]; + desc.its_vmovi_cmd.vpe = map->vpe; desc.its_vmovi_cmd.dev = dev; desc.its_vmovi_cmd.event_id = id; desc.its_vmovi_cmd.db_enabled = map->db_enabled;diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h index 52661b838821..58a4d89aa82c 100644 --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h@@ -62,15 +62,15 @@ struct its_vpe { * irq_set_vcpu_affinity(). * * @vm: Pointer to the GICv4 notion of a VM + * @vpe: Pointer to the GICv4 notion of a virtual CPU (VPE) * @vintid: Virtual LPI number * @db_enabled: Is the VPE doorbell to be generated? - * @vpe_idx: Index (0-based) of the VPE in this VM. Not the vpe_id! */ struct its_vlpi_map { struct its_vm *vm; + struct its_vpe *vpe; u32 vintid; bool db_enabled; - u16 vpe_idx; }; enum its_vcpu_info_cmd_type {diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c index d790d0c74b8b..6ba3d73e0f70 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its, if (ret) return ret; - map.vpe_idx = vcpu->vcpu_id; + map.vpe = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe; return its_map_vlpi(ite->irq->host_irq, &map); }@@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movall(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its, struct its_vlpi_map map; if (!its_get_vlpi(irq->host_irq, &map)) { - map.vpe_idx = vcpu2->vcpu_id; + map.vpe = &vcpu2->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe; its_map_vlpi(irq->host_irq, &map); } }diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c index cf5d6e2de6b8..6ece88322013 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c@@ -288,9 +288,9 @@ int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int virq, */ map = (struct its_vlpi_map) { .vm = &kvm->arch.vgic.its_vm, + .vpe = &irq->target_vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe, .vintid = irq->intid, .db_enabled = true, - .vpe_idx = irq->target_vcpu->vcpu_id, }; if (its_map_vlpi(virq, &map))Maybe I'll introduce a vcpu_to_vpe() helper, but it already looks much better to me...
Yes, indeed. Looks good to me as well. The only thing that makes me slightly nervous is the use of target_vcpu, but I think we rely on it never being NULL for LPIs elsewhere in the code, so we should be fine. Thanks, -Christoffer