Hi Robert,

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:33:02 +0200
Andrea Adami [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Robert Jarzmik [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Boris Brezillon [off-list ref] writes:
 

quoted

Le Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:48:31 +0200,  

quoted

Andrea Adami (9):
  mtd: sharpslpart: Add sharpslpart partition parser
  mtd: nand: sharpsl: Add partition parsers platform data
  mfd: tmio: Add partition parsers platform data
  mtd: nand: sharpsl: Register partitions using the parsers
  mtd: nand: tmio: Register partitions using the parsers  

Applied patches 2, to 5 to nand/next.  

quoted

  ARM: pxa/corgi: Remove hardcoded partitioning, use sharpslpart parser
  ARM: pxa/tosa: Remove hardcoded partitioning, use sharpslpart parser
  ARM: pxa/spitz: Remove hardcoded partitioning, use sharpslpart parser
  ARM: pxa/poodle: Remove hardcoded partitioning, use sharpslpart parser  

I'm quite happy with patches 6 to 9 except for the subject title length.
 

Argh, this time I got it totally wrong with the titles of the patches!
Sorry for the eye-sore.

quoted

Andrea, if you give me an idea of change, I'll modify the titles myself before
applying, no need to resend a serie.

For example, you could propose :
ARM: pxa: corgi: use sharpslpart parser instead of hardcoded one


Then I'll take them into pxa/for-next if there are no objections.

Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on
patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be
wrong if you apply them), so we need to sync. What release is
pxa/for-next targeting? If it's 4.15 I can apply patch 1 just after
4.14-rc1 is out and provide an immutable branch for you to pull in
pxa/for-next.

Regards,

Boris