Thread (23 messages) flat view 23 messages, 5 authors, 2017-08-09

[PATCH v9 1/4] PCI: Add new PCIe Fabric End Node flag, PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING

From: Casey Leedom <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-09 20:11:42
Also in: linux-pci, lkml, netdev

| From: Raj, Ashok [off-list ref]
| Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 11:00 AM
|
| On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:46:07PM +0000, Casey Leedom wrote:
| > | From: Raj, Ashok [off-list ref]
| > | Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 8:58 AM
| > | ...
| > | As Casey pointed out in an earlier thread, we choose the heavy hammer
| > | approach because there are some that can lead to data-corruption as
| > | opposed to perf degradation.
| >
| > Careful.  As far as I'm aware, there is no Data Corruption problem
| > whatsoever with Intel Root Ports and processing of Transaction Layer
| > Packets with and without the Relaxed Ordering Attribute set.
|
| That's right.. no data-corruption on Intel parts :-).. It was with other
| vendor. Only performance issue with intel root-ports in the parts identified
| by the optimization guide.

Yes, I didn't want you to get into any trouble over that possible reading of
what you wrote.

Any progress on the "Chicken Bit" investigation?  Being able to disable the
non-optimal Relaxed Ordering "optimization" would be the best PCI Quirk of
all ...

Casey
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help