[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/4] ACPI: Add APEI GHES Table Generation support
From: gengdongjiu <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-07 08:32:09
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm, qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Hi Laszlo, sorry for my late response. On 2017/6/3 20:01, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 05/22/17 16:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote:quoted
Keeping some context: On 05/12/17 23:00, Laszlo Ersek wrote:quoted
On 04/30/17 07:35, Dongjiu Geng wrote:quoted
(68) In the code below, you are not taking an "OVMF header probe suppressor" into account. But, we have already planned to replace that quirk with a separate, dedicated allocation hint or command, so I'm not going to describe what an "OVMF header probe suppressor" is; instead, I'll describe the replacement for it. [...]So, the NOACPI allocation hint is a no-go at the moment, based on the discussion in the following threads: http://mid.mail-archive.com/20170601112241.2580-1-ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org http://mid.mail-archive.com/c76b36de-ebf9-c662-d454-0a95b43901e8 at redhat.com Therefore the header probe suppression remains necessary. In this case, it is not hard to do, you just have to reorder the following two ADD_POINTER additions a bit:
Ok, it is no problem.
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ + bios_linker_loader_add_pointer(linker, GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE, + sizeof(uint64_t) * i, sizeof(uint64_t), + GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE, + MAX_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT_V6 * sizeof(uint64_t) + + i * MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH);This one should be moved out to a separate loop, after the current loop.quoted
quoted
quoted
+ bios_linker_loader_add_pointer(linker, ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE, + address_registers_offset + + i * sizeof(AcpiGenericHardwareErrorSource), + sizeof(uint32_t), GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE, + i * sizeof(uint64_t));This one should be kept in the first (i.e., current) loop. The idea is, when you first point the HEST/GHES_n entries in ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE to the "address registers" in GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE, all those address registers will still be zero-filled. This will fail the ACPI table header probe in OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe, which is what we want. After this is done, the address registers in GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE should be pointed to the error status data blocks in the same fw_cfg blob, in a separate loop. (Those error status data blocks will again be zero-filled, so no ACPI table headers will be mistakenly recognized in them.)
I understand your idear. but I have a question:
how about we exchange the two function's place, such as shown below:
then it still meets ours needs, the change is easy.
For every loop:
(1)when patch address in ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE to the "address registers", the address register is zero-filed.
(2)when patch address in GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE to the error status data blocks, the error status data block is still zero-filed.
for (i = 0; i < GHES_ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED; i++) {
.....................................
bios_linker_loader_add_pointer(linker, ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE,
address_registers_offset
+ i * sizeof(AcpiGenericHardwareErrorSource),
sizeof(uint32_t), GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE,
i * sizeof(uint64_t));
bios_linker_loader_add_pointer(linker, GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE,
sizeof(uint64_t) * i, sizeof(uint64_t),
GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE,
MAX_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT_V6 * sizeof(uint64_t) +
i * MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH);
.........................................
}
thanks
Thanks Laszlo .