Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2017-07-28

[PATCH 1/3] memory: mtk-smi: add larbid init routine

From: Honghui Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-28 10:38:28
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-mediatek, lkml

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 10:59 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 28/07/17 02:15, Honghui Zhang wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 17:42 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
quoted
On 07/27/2017 04:01 AM, honghui.zhang at mediatek.com wrote:
quoted
From: Honghui Zhang <redacted>

In the commit 3c8f4ad85c4b ("memory/mediatek: add support for mt2701"),
the larb->larbid was added but not initialized.
Mediatek's gen1 smi need this hardware larbid information to get the
register offset which controls whether enable iommu for this larb.
This patch add the initialize routine for larbid.

Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <redacted>
---
  drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
index 2b798bb4..fe36b3e 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
  	struct device_node *smi_node;
  	struct platform_device *smi_pdev;
+	int err;
  
  	if (!dev->pm_domain)
  		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
@@ -263,6 +264,14 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		return PTR_ERR(larb->smi.clk_smi);
  	larb->smi.dev = dev;
  
+	err = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "mediatek,larbid",
+				   &larb->larbid);
+	if (err && of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node,
+					   "mediatek,mt2701-smi-larb")) {
Instead of checking hard-coded bindings you should be able to determine the 
generation using the smi_pdev.
Apart I think it would be better to check for mediatek,larbid only on 
MTK_SIM_GEN1, or do I miss something?
Hi, Matthias,
	There's a new SoC of mediatek which use MTK_SMI_GEN2 hardware, but it
has 2 iommus and 2 smi_common, and we are intend to send it's driver
soon. It need the mediatek,larbid to identify which iommu should be
binding to.

This patch use the hard-code bindings will make the future work easier.
In that case, might it make sense to add some indicator like "bool
need_larb_id" to struct mtk_smi_larb_gen?

Robin.
Hi, Robin, thanks for your advise, I will send another version later.

Thanks.
quoted
thanks.
quoted
Regards,
Matthias
quoted
+		dev_err(dev, "missing larbid property\n");
+		return err;
+	}
+
  	smi_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,smi", 0);
  	if (!smi_node)
  		return -EINVAL;
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help