[PATCH 1/3] memory: mtk-smi: add larbid init routine
From: Honghui Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-28 10:38:28
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 10:59 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 28/07/17 02:15, Honghui Zhang wrote:quoted
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 17:42 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:quoted
On 07/27/2017 04:01 AM, honghui.zhang at mediatek.com wrote:quoted
From: Honghui Zhang <redacted> In the commit 3c8f4ad85c4b ("memory/mediatek: add support for mt2701"), the larb->larbid was added but not initialized. Mediatek's gen1 smi need this hardware larbid information to get the register offset which controls whether enable iommu for this larb. This patch add the initialize routine for larbid. Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <redacted> --- drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c index 2b798bb4..fe36b3e 100644 --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct device_node *smi_node; struct platform_device *smi_pdev; + int err; if (!dev->pm_domain) return -EPROBE_DEFER;@@ -263,6 +264,14 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(larb->smi.clk_smi); larb->smi.dev = dev; + err = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "mediatek,larbid", + &larb->larbid); + if (err && of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, + "mediatek,mt2701-smi-larb")) {Instead of checking hard-coded bindings you should be able to determine the generation using the smi_pdev. Apart I think it would be better to check for mediatek,larbid only on MTK_SIM_GEN1, or do I miss something?Hi, Matthias, There's a new SoC of mediatek which use MTK_SMI_GEN2 hardware, but it has 2 iommus and 2 smi_common, and we are intend to send it's driver soon. It need the mediatek,larbid to identify which iommu should be binding to. This patch use the hard-code bindings will make the future work easier.In that case, might it make sense to add some indicator like "bool need_larb_id" to struct mtk_smi_larb_gen? Robin.
Hi, Robin, thanks for your advise, I will send another version later. Thanks.
quoted
thanks.quoted
Regards, Matthiasquoted
+ dev_err(dev, "missing larbid property\n"); + return err; + } + smi_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,smi", 0); if (!smi_node) return -EINVAL;_______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek