Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2017-08-15

[PATCH v4] acpi/iort: numa: Add numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices

From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-25 16:00:07
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-iommu, lkml

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:13:05PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
On 25.07.17 10:32:37, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
quoted
ARM IORT specification(rev. C) has added  provision to define proximity
domain in SMMUv3 IORT table. Adding required code to parse Proximity
domain and set numa_node of smmv3 platform devices.

Add code to parse proximity domain in SMMUv3 IORT table to
set numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices.

Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <redacted>
---

This patch has dependency on header file patch [1], which is
already merged to linux-pm.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=c944230064eb65e4fa018d86779b4fd200b1d7e7

v4:
  - Fix compilation issue in !CONFIG_NUMA

v3:
  - Addressed Lorenzo Pieralisi comment.

v2:
  - Changed as per Lorenzo Pieralisi and Hanjun Guo suggestions.

v1:
  - Initial patch

 drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
index a3215ee..c5c82c3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
@@ -908,6 +908,28 @@ static bool __init arm_smmu_v3_is_coherent(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
 	return smmu->flags & ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_COHACC_OVERRIDE;
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) && (ACPI_CA_VERSION >= 0x20170629)
This acpica version check was very unhandy for backports when we did
this last time. If we backport just c944230064 and this single patch
it wont work as the version check prevents the code from being
enabled. Isn't there another way to handle cross tree dependencies of
pull requests? E.g. we could base this patch on acpica (ab539eaa50)
and remove the check.
I think I will send this patch (and other IORT ones) via arm64,
if acpica goes via the ACPI tree I do not think there is much else
we can do (that is not complicated).
Alternatively we could do in this case:

#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) && defined(ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_PXM_VALID)
This would do, agreed on all other changes requested, I will send it
to Catalin as soon as I collect all IORT patches for v4.14.

Thanks !
Lorenzo
quoted
+/*
+ * set numa proximity domain for smmuv3 device
+ */
+static void  __init arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
+		struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *smmu;
+
+	smmu = (struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *)node->node_data;
+	if (smmu->flags & ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_PXM_VALID) {
+		set_dev_node(dev, acpi_map_pxm_to_node(smmu->pxm));
+		pr_info("SMMUV3[%llx] Mapped to Proximity domain %d\n",
Better use dev_info() here.
quoted
+			smmu->base_address,
+			smmu->pxm);
+	}
+}
+#else
+static void  __init arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
+		struct device *dev) { }
Just do:

#define arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity NULL
quoted
+#endif
+
 static int __init arm_smmu_count_resources(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
 {
 	struct acpi_iort_smmu *smmu;
@@ -977,20 +999,24 @@ struct iort_iommu_config {
 	int (*iommu_count_resources)(struct acpi_iort_node *node);
 	void (*iommu_init_resources)(struct resource *res,
 				     struct acpi_iort_node *node);
+	void (*iommu_set_proximity)(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
+				     struct device *dev);
Wrt pseudo-OO programming this is more a method for struct dev than
node, so swap args: iommu_set_proximity(dev, node)
quoted
 };
 
 static const struct iort_iommu_config iort_arm_smmu_v3_cfg __initconst = {
 	.name = "arm-smmu-v3",
 	.iommu_is_coherent = arm_smmu_v3_is_coherent,
 	.iommu_count_resources = arm_smmu_v3_count_resources,
-	.iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_v3_init_resources
+	.iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_v3_init_resources,
+	.iommu_set_proximity = arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity
Add comma at the end here.
quoted
 };
 
 static const struct iort_iommu_config iort_arm_smmu_cfg __initconst = {
 	.name = "arm-smmu",
 	.iommu_is_coherent = arm_smmu_is_coherent,
 	.iommu_count_resources = arm_smmu_count_resources,
-	.iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_init_resources
+	.iommu_init_resources = arm_smmu_init_resources,
+	.iommu_set_proximity = NULL
No need for null assignment.

-Robert
quoted
 };
 
 static __init
@@ -1028,6 +1054,9 @@ static int __init iort_add_smmu_platform_device(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
 	if (!pdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	if (ops->iommu_set_proximity)
+		ops->iommu_set_proximity(node, &pdev->dev);
+
 	count = ops->iommu_count_resources(node);
 
 	r = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*r), GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.9.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help